Skip to main content
Glama

Update Page Meta

page_meta_update
Idempotent

Update internal page title, URL slug, and SEO title/description. For already-published pages, this saves an unpublished latest revision only. Do not call page_publish in the same assistant turn after this edit. Stop and tell the user the draft/preview was updated, then wait for a separate user message that explicitly asks to update the live link, publish, or make the changes public before calling page_publish. Do NOT call page_unpublish either — the live page should stay public; only unpublish when the user explicitly asks to take it down.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugNoPreferred public URL slug.
titleNoInternal page title shown in editor results.
pageIdYes
seoTitleNoSEO <title> tag value.
editTokenNo
seoDescriptionNoSEO meta description value.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
slugYes
titleYes
pageIdYes
statusYes
actionsYes
contentNo
claimUrlYes
editTokenYes
expiresAtYes
isClaimedYes
nextStepsNoImprovement hints. Only 'required' items block publishing (they mirror the publish guard); 'recommended' and 'optional' are suggestions to offer after the user has seen the preview, never prerequisites.
canPublishYes
previewUrlYes
isPublishedYes
publishedUrlYes
missingFieldsNo
publishPolicyNoFor edit tools on already-published pages, this is wait_for_separate_user_request to prevent same-turn publishing.
liveUpdateMessageNoPlain-language instruction explaining that an edit to an already-published page is draft-only and must not be published until a later explicit user request.
liveUpdateRequiredNoTrue after an edit to an already-published page when the public live page still needs page_publish to reflect the latest revision.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / nextSteps / description
      Previous value: -"Enrichment hints to present to the user. Address 'required' items before publishing."New value: +"Improvement hints. Only 'required' items block publishing (they mirror the publish guard); 'recommended' and 'optional' are suggestions to offer after the user has seen the preview, never prerequisites."
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare non-destructive and idempotent, but the description adds critical behavior they cannot express: for already-published pages only an unpublished latest revision is saved, and the live page remains public until an explicit publish. This is exactly the workflow-level context a mutation tool needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence and the following sentences are guardrails rather than filler. Slight redundancy between the 'do not call page_publish' and 'do not call page_unpublish' instructions, but each still carries distinct meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values need no explanation, and annotations cover the safety profile. The description supplies the remaining risk-relevant knowledge an agent needs: the draft-vs-live distinction and the required user-confirmation gate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67%; the description names title, slug, and SEO fields, which partially maps to the schema but adds no syntax, format, or constraint detail beyond what the property descriptions already say. pageId and editToken are unaddressed, so this is baseline-adequate rather than additive.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource and enumerates exactly which fields are mutated: internal title, URL slug, SEO title/description. This is sufficient to distinguish it from page_header_update and page_theme_update without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-not-to-use guidance naming siblings page_publish and page_unpublish, plus the exact sequencing rule: stop, report the draft/preview update, and wait for a separate user message explicitly requesting publication before calling page_publish. Nothing is left for the agent to infer.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources