Skip to main content
Glama

Publish Landing Page

page.publish
Idempotent

Publish the latest page revision. Call this only when the user's latest message explicitly asks to publish, make the page live, or get a public share link. Do not call this immediately after page.create or page.create_from_brief just because the draft is publish-ready. For anonymous demo pages, include the editToken returned by page.create. The response includes nextSteps: always share these with the user after publishing — they include the claim reminder and any remaining improvements.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageIdYesThe pageId returned by page.create.
editTokenNoRequired for anonymous demo pages. Use the editToken returned by page.create.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
slugYes
titleYes
pageIdYes
statusYes
actionsYes
contentNo
claimUrlYes
editTokenYes
expiresAtYes
isClaimedYes
nextStepsNoEnrichment hints to present to the user. Address 'required' items before publishing.
canPublishYes
previewUrlYes
isPublishedYes
publishedUrlYes
missingFieldsNo
publishPolicyNoFor edit tools on already-published pages, this is wait_for_separate_user_request to prevent same-turn publishing.
liveUpdateMessageNoPlain-language instruction explaining that an edit to an already-published page is draft-only and must not be published until a later explicit user request.
liveUpdateRequiredNoTrue after an edit to an already-published page when the public live page still needs page.publish to reflect the latest revision.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description adds important behavioral context: the need to include editToken for anonymous demo pages, and the instruction to always share nextSteps with the user after publishing. This enriches the agent's understanding of side effects and requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is four sentences and around 80 words, which is somewhat longer than the ideal, but every sentence earns its place: the action, usage condition, negative constraint, and post-publishing behavior. It is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity, the description covers when to use it, when not to use it, authentication requirements (editToken), and how to handle the response (share nextSteps). The presence of an output schema also reduces the need to explain return values, making this description fully sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters are described clearly in the input schema. The description repeats the editToken condition but adds no new semantic detail beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Publish the latest page revision' with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like page.create and page.unpublish. It immediately clarifies the tool's primary function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly states when to call ('only when the user's latest message explicitly asks to publish, make the page live, or get a public share link') and when not to call ('Do not call this immediately after page.create or page.create_from_brief just because the draft is publish-ready'). This provides clear guidance versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target distinct resources and actions (blocks, accounts, pages), but page.create and page.create_from_brief both create pages, and page.intake.start vs page.onboarding.start/update are overlapping planning helpers. The detailed descriptions help disambiguate, though an agent might still pause on choosing between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent lowercase dot-separated resource.action pattern (e.g., block.add, page.publish, account.whoami). Nested resources like page.header.update and page.onboarding.update extend the same rule without mixing conventions.

Tool Count3/5

At 23 tools, the count sits in the borderline 16-25 range. Many tools are specific and justified, but the planning helpers (intake/onboarding) and multiple page creation variants add bulk that could be consolidated.

Completeness3/5

The server covers create, read, update, block management, and publish/unpublish, but misses a page.delete operation, leaving a lifecycle dead-end. Account tools are also minimal, limited to reading/listing without management capabilities.

Resources