Skip to main content
Glama

Manage Claimed Page

account_page_manage
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read a claimed account page without requiring an editToken. Use after OAuth when the user wants to manage a durable website.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageIdYesThe claimed pageId to manage.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
slugYes
titleYes
pageIdYes
statusYes
actionsYes
contentNo
claimUrlYes
editTokenYes
expiresAtYes
isClaimedYes
nextStepsNoEnrichment hints to present to the user. Address 'required' items before publishing.
canPublishYes
previewUrlYes
isPublishedYes
publishedUrlYes
missingFieldsNo
publishPolicyNoFor edit tools on already-published pages, this is wait_for_separate_user_request to prevent same-turn publishing.
liveUpdateMessageNoPlain-language instruction explaining that an edit to an already-published page is draft-only and must not be published until a later explicit user request.
liveUpdateRequiredNoTrue after an edit to an already-published page when the public live page still needs page_publish to reflect the latest revision.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, and non-destructive hints. The description adds relevant auth context ('without requiring an editToken') and a post-OAuth condition, which are not captured by annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no redundancy; the action is front-loaded and the usage context follows immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With one simple parameter, an output schema, and annotations covering safety, the description supplies the remaining context needed (auth requirement and when to use), making it functionally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema fully describes the sole parameter `pageId` (100% coverage), so the baseline of 3 applies; the description doesn't add further parameter details but also doesn't need to.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Read') and resource ('a claimed account page'), with a key qualifier 'without requiring an editToken.' It is distinguishable from page_get by the editToken condition and the 'claimed' scope, though no sibling is named.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly provides a usage context: 'Use after OAuth when the user wants to manage a durable website.' This tells the agent when the tool applies but does not mention exclusions or alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources