Skip to main content
Glama

Coordinalo — Service Business Operations

agendas_update

Update a public agenda’s configuration. Partial update — only provided fields are changed. Supports modifying: title, description, visibility (isPublic/isActive), booking flow order (service_first/provider_first/auto), selection modes for service and provider (required/optional/auto/hidden), assignment strategy (manual/round_robin/least_booked/most_available/priority/random), privacy flags (showSessions, showClientNames, showProviderUtilization, showProviderList), prepayment, and provider/service linking. When a provider is assigned, their services are auto-linked to the agenda.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugNo
titleNo
apiKeyNo
orgSlugYes
agendaIdYes
categoryNo
isActiveNo
isPublicNo
expiresAtNo
isDefaultNo
descriptionNo
proveedorIdNo
showSessionsNo
showClientNamesNo
bookingFlowOrderNo
defaultDurationsNo
showProviderListNo
assignmentStrategyNo
requiresPrepaymentNo
allowGroupSelectionNo
serviceSelectionModeNo
providerSelectionModeNo
showProviderUtilizationNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / allowOnDemandBooking
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / allowSameDayBooking
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / cancellationDeadlineMinutes
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / cancellationPenaltyType
      Removed value: -{
      -  "enum": [
      -    "none",
      -    "fixed",
      -    "percentage"
      -  ],
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / cancellationPenaltyValue
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / cancellationPolicyType
      Removed value: -{
      -  "enum": [
      -    "none",
      -    "flexible",
      -    "moderate",
      -    "strict"
      -  ],
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / maxAdvanceBookingDays
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
    • removedInput schema / properties / minAdvanceBookingMinutes
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "number"
      -}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / allowComments
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses partial update behavior and auto-linking side effect when a provider is assigned. No annotations are provided, so description carries burden; it covers key behaviors but omits permissions and error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with purpose and partial-update note, then compactly lists supported modifications in a structured manner. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite 23 parameters and no output schema, the description conveys core semantics and side effects, but lacks details on return values, validation, or required fields beyond the obvious; still adequate for most use cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates by enumerating updatable fields, enum values for bookingFlowOrder, assignmentStrategy, selection modes, and boolean privacy flags. However, it does not mention all 23 parameters, leaving some like slug, apiKey, expiresAt undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a public agenda’s configuration' with a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like agendas_create/delete/list/get by focusing on modification.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for modifying an existing agenda by listing updatable fields and partial update semantics. It does not explicitly contrast with alternatives but provides enough context to infer when this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.