Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds critical behavioral context beyond the annotations. Specifically, it states that 'All content and versions are preserved,' which mitigates the perceived risk of the destructiveHint=true annotation, and confirms the action is reversible via 'publish_site.'

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured, front-loading the primary function and consequence. The second paragraph, however, is slightly verbose, though necessary to convey the critical usage context and reversibility.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a destructive mutation that requires knowing the impact (offline status) and the recovery method. The description covers all these necessary pieces of information, making it highly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, the schema defines the parameter fully. The description does not need to add semantic meaning to the single required parameter, landing on the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly defines the action ('Take a live landing page offline') and the resulting state ('no longer be publicly accessible'). It establishes a clear scope for the tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides explicit guidelines on when to use the tool (temporarily or permanently removing a page) and implies the correct alternative workflow by referencing 'publish_site' to reverse the action.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.