Skip to main content
Glama

CoinRithm Agent Trading

by com.coinrithm.mcp
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

Who am I (CoinRithm)

whoami
Read-only

Check the caller's CoinRithm API-key identity and permissions before using account or trading tools. Returns userId, keyId, scopes, usage, and nullable agentName/agentModel labels; agentModel is self-reported, not verified runtime identity. Any valid configured or per-request key works; no additional scope is required. Missing or invalid keys return 401. Omit agentTrace for a simple check. Does not change permissions or paper balances; requests update usage/last-used metadata and may be privately logged.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
agentTraceNoOptional private trace metadata stored in the caller's ledger.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYes
bodyNo
httpStatusYes
ledgerStatusNo
ledgerEventIdNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • removedOutput schema / properties / body / description
      Removed value: -"Parsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / httpStatus / description
      Removed value: -"HTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / ledgerEventId / description
      Removed value: -"Private AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / ledgerStatus / description
      Removed value: -"Ledger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present."
    • removedOutput schema / properties / ok / description
      Removed value: -"True when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
    • addedInput schema / properties / agentTrace
      Added value: +{
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "description": "Optional private trace metadata stored in the caller's ledger.",
+  "properties": {
+    "confidence": {
+      "description": "Optional confidence score from 0 to 1.",
+      "maximum": 1,
+      "minimum": 0,
+      "type": "number"
+    },
+    "decisionId": {
+      "description": "Agent decision id for quote/write attribution.",
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "rationaleSummary": {
+      "description": "Optional concise rationale summary. Do not include chain-of-thought, secrets, or account identity.",
+      "maxLength": 1200,
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "runId": {
+      "description": "Agent run id for grouping.",
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    "strategyLabel": {
+      "description": "Short strategy label, self-reported by the caller.",
+      "maxLength": 120,
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / ledgerEventId
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Private AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present.",
+  "type": [
+    "string",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / ledgerStatus
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Ledger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present.",
+  "type": [
+    "string",
+    "null"
+  ]
+}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": false,
+  "properties": {
+    "body": {
+      "description": "Parsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON."
+    },
+    "httpStatus": {
+      "description": "HTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors.",
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    "ok": {
+      "description": "True when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response.",
+      "type": "boolean"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "httpStatus",
+    "ok"
+  ],
+  "type": "object"
+}
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnly/destructive annotations, it discloses the 401 failure mode for missing/invalid keys, that permissions and paper balances are unaffected, that requests update usage/last-used metadata and may be privately logged, and that agentModel is self-reported rather than verified identity. This resolves the apparent tension with readOnlyHint=true by clarifying the only side effects are metadata/logging.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and prerequisite are front-loaded, and nearly every clause carries distinct information (returns, auth behavior, side effects, parameter hint). It is denser than strictly necessary and could be trimmed slightly, but nothing is filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given an output schema exists, the description needn't explain return values in depth, yet it does briefly enumerate them. Combined with auth behavior, side-effect disclosure, and the parameter hint, an agent has everything needed to call it correctly in a pre-trade identity check.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage and a nested agentTrace object, the baseline is 3, but the description adds real value: it tells the agent to omit agentTrace for a simple check and warns that strategyLabel/agentModel content is self-reported metadata, not verified identity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence states a specific verb (check) and resource (CoinRithm API-key identity and permissions) and positions it as a prerequisite to account/trading tools, which clearly separates it from siblings like get_portfolio or place_spot_order. It also enumerates the returned fields, so an agent knows exactly what it gets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear context ('before using account or trading tools') and practical conditions ('Any valid configured or per-request key works; no additional scope is required', 'Omit agentTrace for a simple check'). It doesn't name an alternative tool or explicit when-not-to-use, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All CoinRithm Agent Trading toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources