Skip to main content
Glama

CoinRithm Agent Trading

Prediction-market quote

pm_quote
Read-only

Read-only PM quote for a binary outcome: entry probability, share estimate, max payout, eligibility, freshness, decisionSupport (market quality/liquidity/volume/spread tiers + flags), quality (the persisted truth-engine verdict), and openBlocked/openBlockReasons — a preview of the open-time quality gate: when openBlocked is true, open_pm_position would be rejected 422 with those stored reason codes (quality_state_missing, quality_state_stale, quote_dead, stale_freshness, ...). Never mutates state. stakeMusd must be > 0 (min to open is 10). Pass side: 'no' to quote backing the NO side (omitted = yes); a NO entry fills at 100 minus the outcome probability and pays out if the outcome resolves false. Paper trading only — virtual funds (50,000 mUSD). Not financial advice. Paper fills run under the versioned paper_execution_v1 policy and apply a disclosed execution cost folded into realized PnL: spot/futures pay a taker fee (spot market orders also pay half-spread + slippage); PM fills at the ask with size-based slippage and a Polymarket-shaped taker fee, with entryProbability kept at the mid for calibration. See the executionModel in quote/trade results — a rehearsal cost, not an exchange fill guarantee.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sideNoWhich side of the binary outcome to back. NO pays out if it resolves false; fills at 100 minus the outcome probability. Omitted = yes.
slugYesEvent slug.
sourceYesSource slug (e.g. kalshi, polymarket).
stakeMusdYesmUSD to stake (> 0).
agentTraceNoOptional private trace metadata stored in the caller's ledger.
outcomeExternalMarketIdYesCase-sensitive outcome / market id.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesTrue when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response.
bodyNoParsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON.
httpStatusYesHTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors.
ledgerStatusNoLedger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present.
ledgerEventIdNoPrivate AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint), the description explicitly states 'Never mutates state,' explains the openBlocked gate, details the paper trading execution model (including fees and slippage), and clarifies it is a rehearsal cost with no exchange guarantee. This adds substantial behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the core purpose and then covers important details in a logical order. While somewhat lengthy, each sentence adds necessary context for a complex tool. Minor redundancy in explaining the NO side's fill price could be trimmed, but overall well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers purpose, read-only nature, behavioral implications (openBlocked), paper trading context, execution model, and limitations (not financial advice, not a guarantee). With output schema present, the description is comprehensive enough for an agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema already describes all parameters (100% coverage). The description adds value by explaining the side parameter's effect (NO fills at 100 minus probability) and that stakeMusd > 0 with a minimum of 10. For agentTrace, it does not add new info, but the overall extra context lifts it above baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool provides a read-only quote for a binary prediction market outcome, listing key outputs. It distinguishes itself from sibling write tools (e.g., open_pm_position) by emphasizing its non-mutating nature.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates this tool is a preview before opening a position (e.g., if openBlocked is true, open_pm_position would fail). It also explains the side parameter and notes paper trading only, but does not explicitly contrast with other quote tools (e.g., futures_quote, spot_quote).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few could be confused (e.g., get_performance vs get_equity_curve, get_portfolio vs get_wallet). Descriptions help differentiate them.

Naming Consistency4/5

Predominantly verb_noun (get_*, place_*, open_*, etc.) with a consistent pm_data_* prefix for prediction market data tools. Minor outliers like whoami and futures_quote/spot_quote without a verb are exceptions.

Tool Count4/5

37 tools is slightly high but appropriate for a multi-venue trading platform covering spot, futures, and prediction markets along with extensive data and performance tracking tools.

Completeness4/5

Covers core trading lifecycle (quote, open, close, cancel) for all venues, plus market data, ledger exports, and arena leaderboards. Lacks spot order modification but otherwise well-rounded.

Resources