Skip to main content
Glama

CoinRithm Agent Trading

Search prediction markets across all venues

pm_data_events
Read-only

Free public search over prediction-market events across ALL 12 venues (Polymarket, Kalshi, Rothera, Limitless, Smarkets, Manifold, Metaculus, PredictIt, Futuur, Myriad, ForecastEx, Gemini) — broader than discover_pm_markets, which is scoped to the paper-tradeable venues. Returns titles, probabilities, volume/liquidity, status, and source per event, plus the five highest-probability outcomes and the full outcome count. Use pm_data_event for all outcomes and full evidence. Also returns referenceProbability when present (CoinRithm's canonical cross-venue number for open events matched across venues — probability, venueCount, spreadPoints, and outcomeName for multi-outcome leaders), quality (persisted truth-engine verdict: decisionEligible + warning/block reason codes — blocked markets stay visible but cannot drive paper opens or alerts), and crossPlatform (sibling venues pricing the same question). Research/data only: to trade, use discover_pm_markets + pm_quote instead. No API key required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
qNoOptional search text.
fiatNoFiat currency code for monetary figures (default usd).
sortNoOptional sort key.
limitNoMax rows (1-50, default 20).
offsetNoPagination offset (default 0).
sourceNoOptional venue filter: polymarket, kalshi, rothera, limitless, smarkets, manifold, metaculus, predictit, futuur, myriad, forecastex, or gemini.
statusNoOptional status filter (e.g. open or closed).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
okYesTrue when CoinRithm returned a successful 2xx response.
bodyNoParsed CoinRithm response body, or raw text when the response is not JSON.
httpStatusYesHTTP status returned by CoinRithm, or 0 for network errors.
ledgerStatusNoLedger write status header returned by CoinRithm, when present.
ledgerEventIdNoPrivate AgentActionEvent id returned by /api/agent/*, when present.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description details return fields (titles, probabilities, volume/liquidity, status, source, outcomes, referenceProbability, quality, crossPlatform) and behavioral notes (blocked markets stay visible but cannot drive opens). Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, with no contradiction; the description adds substantial value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat lengthy but well-structured, front-loading the core purpose and adding essential details. Every sentence contributes value, though it could be slightly more concise (e.g., venue list repetition).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters with 100% schema coverage, output schema exists, and the description explains output fields and trade-offs with sibling tools, it is fully complete for effective agent use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add new meaning beyond the schema for the parameters (q, fiat, sort, limit, offset, source, status). It explains the output but not the parameters themselves.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies 'Free public search over prediction-market events across ALL 12 venues', listing each venue and contrasting with discover_pm_markets. The verb 'search' and resource 'prediction-market events' are clear and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use: 'broader than discover_pm_markets' and 'Research/data only: to trade, use discover_pm_markets + pm_quote instead.' Also notes 'No API key required,' providing clear context for usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few could be confused (e.g., get_performance vs get_equity_curve, get_portfolio vs get_wallet). Descriptions help differentiate them.

Naming Consistency4/5

Predominantly verb_noun (get_*, place_*, open_*, etc.) with a consistent pm_data_* prefix for prediction market data tools. Minor outliers like whoami and futures_quote/spot_quote without a verb are exceptions.

Tool Count4/5

37 tools is slightly high but appropriate for a multi-venue trading platform covering spot, futures, and prediction markets along with extensive data and performance tracking tools.

Completeness4/5

Covers core trading lifecycle (quote, open, close, cancel) for all venues, plus market data, ledger exports, and arena leaderboards. Lacks spot order modification but otherwise well-rounded.

Resources