Skip to main content
Glama

status

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get the CoinPaprika MCP server's status and configuration (uptime, mode, enabled features). Use when asked 'is the server up', 'what mode am I in', 'server status'. This reports the MCP server itself, not the crypto market; for market health use getGlobal. Read-only; takes no parameters and needs no API key.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rationaleYesREQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modeNo
tierNo
statusNo
api_baseNo
paid_featuresNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed5 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / api_base / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / mode / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / paid_features / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / status / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / tier / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / rationale / description
      Previous value: -"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets — use generic descriptions."New value: +"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "api_base": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "mode": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "paid_features": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "tier": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is structured data. The description still adds useful context beyond that: it needs no API key and reports server metadata rather than market data, which is a real disclosure. The only missing piece is what the status payload looks like, which the output schema covers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and the returned fields, then the disambiguation and the read-only/credential note. Each clause carries distinct information with no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-business-argument, read-only status tool with an output schema and complete annotations, nothing an agent needs is absent. The description covers purpose, disambiguation and access requirements.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the required 'rationale' parameter is fully documented in the schema and the baseline 3 applies. However, the description's claim that the tool 'takes no parameters' is imprecise given a mandatory rationale field exists, so it neither helps nor fully compensates here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The definition pairs a specific verb with a specific resource ('Get the CoinPaprika MCP server's status and configuration') and enumerates what that report contains (uptime, mode, enabled features). It also explicitly rules out the market-health reading that siblings like getGlobal provide, so an agent can separate the two without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives literal trigger utterances ('is the server up', 'what mode am I in', 'server status') and names the alternative tool, getGlobal, for the case the agent actually wants market health. Both the when and the when-not are covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources