Skip to main content
Glama

resolveId

Read-onlyIdempotent

Resolve a fuzzy coin, exchange, person or tag name or symbol to a ranked list of candidate CoinPaprika ids, best first (take the top one). Call FIRST when you have a bare name or symbol but need an id, since ids are not derivable, then pass the id to getTickersById for price. Returns candidates with id, name, symbol, type and rank; an empty list means no match. Read-only. Params: type (required; one of 'coin', 'exchange', 'people', 'tags') sets entity kind; query (required) is the fuzzy text; limit (optional, default 50, max 250) caps candidates. Answers 'id for AAVE', 'resolve Vitalik'. No API key required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
typeYes
limitNo
queryYes
rationaleYesREQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / rationale / description
      Previous value: -"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets — use generic descriptions."New value: +"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "results": {
      +      "items": {},
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "results"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint, and destructiveHint false. The description adds useful behavioral context beyond those annotations: results are ranked best-first, the return fields are listed, an empty list means no match, ids are not derivable, and no API key is required.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with purpose and workflow, followed by terse parameter explanations, examples, and auth notes. Every sentence adds a distinct useful fact, with no filler or repetition of the schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the read-only, idempotent annotations and the presence of an output schema, the description covers trigger conditions, follow-up use, return value shape, failure semantics, and parameter constraints. Nothing essential for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25%, so the description carries most of the parameter burden. It clearly explains type ('one of coin, exchange, people, tags sets entity kind'), query ('fuzzy text'), and limit ('optional, default 50, max 250'). However, it omits the required 'rationale' parameter from the natural-language params list, even though the schema itself documents rationale well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Resolve'), a clear resource ('fuzzy coin, exchange, person or tag name or symbol'), and a definite outcome ('ranked list of candidate CoinPaprika ids, best first'). It also differentiates the tool from siblings by explaining it is the id-resolution step before getTickersById.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Call FIRST when you have a bare name or symbol but need an id' and prescribes the follow-up action: 'pass the id to getTickersById for price.' This gives an agent concrete when-to-use guidance and prevents confusion with sibling lookup tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources