Skip to main content
Glama

getTagById

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get details for one CoinPaprika tag (a category such as 'defi' or 'stablecoin'): its id, name, description, coin_counter, ico_counter, and optionally the coins and ICOs grouped under it. Use for 'what coins are in the defi tag', 'show the stablecoin category', 'tokens tagged ai'. To list every tag or find a tagId first use getTags. Read-only. Params: tagId (required) is a tag id from getTags such as 'defi'; additionalFields (optional, default none) is a comma-separated list of extra sections, valid values 'coins' and 'icos' (example 'coins,icos'). An unknown tagId returns an error. No API key required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tagIdYes
rationaleYesREQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions.
additionalFieldsNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
icosNo
nameNo
typeNo
coinsNoPresent when additionalFields=coins is requested.
descriptionNo
ico_counterNo
coin_counterNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / rationale / description
      Previous value: -"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets — use generic descriptions."New value: +"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "coin_counter": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "coins": {
      +      "description": "Present when additionalFields=coins is requested.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "description": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "ico_counter": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "icos": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "id": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "name": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, openWorld, idempotent, and non-destructive, but the description adds valuable behavior beyond that: unknown tagId returns an error, no API key is required, additionalFields is optional and defaults to none, and valid values are enumerated. No contradiction with annotations exists.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but every sentence earns its place: purpose, return fields, use cases, sibling tool relationship, parameter semantics, default behavior, error behavior, and auth requirement are all covered in a compact, front-loaded block.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only lookup tool with a rich schema and output schema, the description covers everything needed to call it correctly: how to obtain tagId, optional fields, valid values, error behavior, and authentication. Nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 33% schema description coverage, the description compensates thoroughly: tagId is explained as an id from getTags with an example, and additionalFields is described as a comma-separated list with valid values and a concrete example. The rationale parameter is fully described in the schema itself, so no gap remains.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Get details for one CoinPaprika tag', and enumerates exactly what fields are returned. It also gives concrete examples ('defi', 'stablecoin') and explicitly contrasts with getTags, making sibling differentiation immediate.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides explicit use cases ('what coins are in the defi tag', 'show the stablecoin category') and names the alternative tool and the condition for choosing it: 'To list every tag or find a tagId first use getTags.' It also clarifies required input provenance and error behavior for unknown tags.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources