Skip to main content
Glama

getTagById

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get details for one CoinPaprika tag (a category such as 'defi' or 'stablecoin'): its id, name, description, coin_counter, ico_counter, and optionally the coins and ICOs grouped under it. Use for 'what coins are in the defi tag', 'show the stablecoin category', 'tokens tagged ai'. To list every tag or find a tagId first use getTags. Read-only. Params: tagId (required) is a tag id from getTags such as 'defi'; additionalFields (optional, default none) is a comma-separated list of extra sections, valid values 'coins' and 'icos' (example 'coins,icos'). An unknown tagId returns an error. No API key required.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tagIdYes
rationaleYesREQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions.
additionalFieldsNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idNo
icosNo
nameNo
typeNo
coinsNoPresent when additionalFields=coins is requested.
descriptionNo
ico_counterNo
coin_counterNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / coin_counter / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / coins / items / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / ico_counter / type
      Previous value: -"number"New value: +[
      +  "number",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / icos / items / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / id / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / name / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / properties / type / type
      Previous value: -"string"New value: +[
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / rationale / description
      Previous value: -"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets — use generic descriptions."New value: +"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "coin_counter": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "coins": {
      +      "description": "Present when additionalFields=coins is requested.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "description": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "ico_counter": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "icos": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "id": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "name": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "type": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, so 'Read-only' adds little, but the description contributes real extras: 'An unknown tagId returns an error' and 'No API key required' are auth/error behaviors not present in the annotations. It stops short of describing result size or pagination for the optional coin/ICO sections.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with purpose and example intents before the parameter block, and nearly every clause carries information. It is dense but slightly run-on, and the trailing 'Read-only' restates an annotation without adding anything.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a three-parameter read tool with an output schema, this covers purpose, sibling routing, both undocumented parameters with valid values, error behavior, and auth requirements. Nothing an agent needs to invoke it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 33%, so the description carries the load and does so well: tagId is marked required with provenance ('from getTags such as defi'), and additionalFields gets a default ('none'), format ('comma-separated list'), and valid values ('coins', 'icos') plus an example — none of which appears in the schema. The required 'rationale' param is left to its own thorough schema description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Get details for one CoinPaprika tag'), enumerates the returned fields, and clarifies what a tag is with concrete examples ('defi', 'stablecoin'). It explicitly distinguishes itself from the sibling getTags, which lists all tags.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides concrete user-intent phrasings ('what coins are in the defi tag', 'tokens tagged ai') that map to this tool and explicitly routes the alternative case ('to list every tag or find a tagId first use getTags'). The agent knows both when to call this and when to call a sibling instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources