Skip to main content
Glama

CoinPaprika

by com.coinpaprika.mcp

getCoinExchanges

Read-onlyIdempotent

List the exchanges that LIST a specific coin (venue names only). Use for 'which exchanges list X', 'is X on Coinbase', 'where is X listed'. For where to BUY with per-market price and volume use getCoinMarkets; for the live price use getTickersById. Read-only; coinId is a canonical id, limit caps results. No API key required.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo
coinIdYesCanonical CoinPaprika coin slug in 'symbol-name' format, e.g. 'btc-bitcoin', 'eth-ethereum', 'ada-cardano'. Do NOT pass ticker symbols ('BTC', 'AAVE') or guess the slug — it is not derivable from the symbol (e.g. AAVE resolves to 'aave-new', which you could not guess). Call search or resolveId first to resolve a symbol or name to its canonical id.
rationaleYesREQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets — use generic descriptions.

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, etc. Description adds 'Read-only', 'No API key required', and 'limit caps results', which are useful behavioral details beyond annotations. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, each serving a purpose: action, use cases, alternatives, additional constraints. No fluff. Front-loaded with the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple listing tool, the description covers all necessary context: what it returns (venue names), parameter behavior (coinId canonical, limit caps), and relationship to sibling tools. No output schema needed; description suffices.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers coinId and rationale with detailed descriptions, but limit lacks description. The tool description compensates by stating 'limit caps results', adding meaning to the limit parameter. It also reinforces the canonical id format for coinId.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists exchanges that list a specific coin (venue names only). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like getCoinMarkets and getTickersById by specifying that those are for buying with price/volume and live price respectively.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly lists use cases: 'which exchanges list X', 'is X on Coinbase', 'where is X listed'. It also tells when not to use it: for buying with price/volume use getCoinMarkets; for live price use getTickersById.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All CoinPaprika toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., getTickersById vs getTickersHistoricalById), but search and resolveId could cause confusion as both find entities. Overall, overlaps are minimal and well-documented.

Naming Consistency4/5

Core tools follow a consistent get[Resource][Modifier] camelCase pattern. Some utility tools (priceConverter, resolveId, search, keyInfo, submitFeedback, status) break the pattern, but they are clearly separate and the naming is still readable.

Tool Count3/5

With 31 tools, the server is comprehensive but slightly heavy. Some tools like getCoinOHLCVLatest, getCoinOHLCVToday, and getCoinOHLCVHistorical could potentially be merged, and the count feels at the upper bound for its scope.

Completeness4/5

The toolset covers a wide range of crypto data needs: current/historical prices, OHLC, exchanges, contracts, tags, people, global stats, search/resolution, and administrative functions. Only advanced features like news or portfolio tracking are missing.

Resources