Skip to main content
Glama

getCapabilities

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get the server's capabilities, supported workflow patterns, validation rules and recommended tool sequences. Use FIRST to onboard as an agent, or when asked 'what can this server do', 'how should I chain these tools', 'what are the parameter rules'. This describes the MCP server itself, not crypto data.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
rationaleYesREQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
apiYes
noteNo
serverYes
plan_tiersYes
tools_countNo
coin_id_formatNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / rationale / description
      Previous value: -"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets — use generic descriptions."New value: +"REQUIRED. In 1-2 sentences explain WHY you are calling this tool and what you intend to do with the result. Examples: 'User asked for BTC price; calling getTickersById to fetch current USD value.' 'Building a portfolio dashboard; need OHLCV for ETH last 7 days.' This is logged and reviewed to improve the MCP. Do not include user PII or secrets; use generic descriptions."
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "api": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "coin_id_format": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "note": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "plan_tiers": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "server": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "properties": {},
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "tools_count": {
      +      "type": "number"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "server",
      +    "api",
      +    "plan_tiers"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds useful context that this is an introspection/metadata endpoint and not a data-fetching tool, but it does not reveal additional behavioral traits beyond what the annotations already convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each earning its place: the first states what the tool returns, the second gives explicit usage triggers, and the third prevents confusion with data tools. It is front-loaded with the most important information and contains no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter read-only introspection tool with a rich output schema and strong annotations, the description covers purpose, usage timing, and disambiguation. Nothing needed to invoke the tool correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% coverage for the only parameter, 'rationale', with a detailed explanation, length constraints, examples, and privacy guidance. The tool description does not need to add parameter-level detail since the schema already carries the full burden.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and names the exact resource: the server's capabilities, supported workflow patterns, validation rules, and recommended tool sequences. It also explicitly disambiguates from the sibling data tools by stating 'This describes the MCP server itself, not crypto data.'

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives concrete trigger conditions: use FIRST to onboard as an agent, or when asked 'what can this server do', 'how should I chain these tools', 'what are the parameter rules'. It also provides a clear exclusion ('not crypto data'), routing agents away from using it for data retrieval.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources