Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return shape needn't be restated, yet the description still explains the meaning of the returned fields (key, label, records, implies, omitted_values, index_records). Combined with the sibling cross-reference, an agent has everything needed to call and interpret this tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.