Skip to main content
Glama

Connect social accounts

connect_social_accounts
Destructive

Create a private authorization link for connecting social accounts to the linked Clypmint account. The account owner chooses networks and grants access on the provider’s authorization screen. Does not publish content.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "connect_social_accounts"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
codeNo
costNo
errorNo
stateNo
statusNo
dry_runNo
messageNo
plan_idNo
style_idNo
video_idNo
availableNo
import_idNo
output_idNo
studio_urlNo
version_idNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added
  2. Removed
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"New value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "Clypmint connect_social_accounts result. Error results carry error; successful requests expose the identifiers and state available for the next step. Signed media stays in private metadata.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "available": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "code": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "cost": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "dry_run": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "error": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "import_id": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "message": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "output_id": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "plan_id": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "state": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "status": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "integer",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "studio_url": {
      +      "format": "uri",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "style_id": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "version_id": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "video_id": {
      +      "type": [
      +        "string",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, and destructiveHint=true, and the description usefully explains that the flow happens on the provider's external authorization screen with the owner granting access, plus that no content is published. However, it never explains what makes this destructive under the annotation (e.g., whether existing connections or tokens are replaced/revoked).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences, front-loaded with the action and the resulting artifact, followed by a clarifying negative constraint. No filler words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple (no params) and has an output schema, so the description need not explain return values. It covers the out-of-band authorization flow and the no-publish guarantee, but leaves the destructive implication of the annotations unaddressed, which an agent calling a connection tool would want to know.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate; the baseline for a no-parameter tool applies. The description correctly avoids inventing parameter detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Create a private authorization link for connecting social accounts to the linked Clypmint account.' This is clearly distinguishable from the sibling get_social_accounts (which reads rather than creates) and from publishing tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the when: an agent should call this to establish an account connection, and it explicitly rules out a related misconception with 'Does not publish content', steering agents away from conflating it with schedule_post/upload_for_post. It does not explicitly name a sibling or state prerequisites, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources