Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Read-only nature is covered by annotations; description adds specific behavioral detail about classifying rounds and exposing economy stats. No side-effect caveats needed beyond readOnlyHint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short, dense sentences front-load the purpose and list concrete outputs. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With the schema covering the input and an output schema present, the description tells the agent what the tool produces at the map level. No usage exclusions or alternative routing are mentioned, but the context is inferable for a read-only map-economy query.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single mapId parameter is already fully described in the schema with an example. The description does not add parameter-specific meaning, but schema coverage is complete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action ('Classifies') and resource (round-by-round economy for a CS2 map) with concrete output categories (buy types, spend, freeze-time values, loss bonus). It is distinct from sibling CS2 stat tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended use is implied by the content (analyze CS2 round economy), but there is no explicit statement of when to use it vs. sibling tools, nor any exclusions or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.