Skip to main content
Glama

List archived versions

list_versions
Read-onlyIdempotent

List the archived versions of an extension that Chrome-Stats holds, with the download URL for each. The files themselves are not returned — use the URL with the same API key.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "list_versions"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesChrome extension ID, Edge add-on ID, Firefox add-on slug/GUID, Android package name, or Apple App Store app ID. For example bmnlcjabgnpnenekpadlanbbkooimhnj or com.joinhoney.honeyandroid.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds one genuinely useful non-schema fact — the files are not returned and the URL requires the API key — but says nothing about pagination, result ordering, or unauthenticated failure behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, zero filler. The capability and the return-shape caveat are both front-loaded before any follow-up guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description responsibly explains what comes back (a download URL per version) and what does not (the files). Complete enough to call correctly; only pagination/ordering behavior is left unaddressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter, and the schema documents it at 100% coverage including ID formats across Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Android and iOS. The description does not need to restate identifier semantics, so the schema carries this dimension.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource — 'List the archived versions of an extension' — plus the payload ('download URL for each'), which separates it from get_extension's current-version data. It never names a sibling explicitly, so the differentiation is implied rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives clear context for use and, importantly, tells the agent what to do next: 'use the URL with the same API key.' It does not name alternatives or say when not to call it, keeping it below a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources