close_collectingStops new messages arriving and returns the final counts with the gift link. Nothing is deleted and nothing is finished; it can be reopened.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| book | Yes | The handle start_book gave you. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond the annotations by stating 'Nothing is deleted and nothing is finished; it can be reopened.' This discloses the non-destructive, reversible nature of the operation. It also clarifies the result (final counts with gift link), which is useful since there is no output schema.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two concise sentences with no wasted words. The primary action and result are front-loaded, followed by the important reversibility note. Every sentence earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description adequately covers what happens, what is returned, and the reversible nature of the action. It could be slightly more explicit about when exactly to call it (e.g., after start_book), but the param description covers the required input and the overall flow is understandable.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema fully documents the single parameter 'book' as 'The handle start_book gave you.' The description does not add extra parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states a specific action ('Stops new messages arriving') and a specific output ('returns the final counts with the gift link'). It clearly distinguishes from siblings like reopen_collecting and get_links by describing the unique stopping-and-linking behavior.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use this tool—when you want to stop collecting and obtain the gift link—but does not explicitly contrast it with alternatives such as book_status or get_links. The mention 'it can be reopened' hints at a relationship with reopen_collecting, but no explicit when/when-not guidance is provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool clearly targets a distinct part of the book lifecycle: starting, collecting, closing, reopening, sharing links, and checking collection or order status. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between the tools.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern like start_book, close_collecting, and get_links, while book_status and order_status use a noun_status pattern. The bare 'order' tool breaks the pattern and could be seen as a noun or verb, making the naming slightly mixed but still readable.
Seven tools is well-scoped for the server's purpose: managing a message-collection book from creation through ordering. Each tool covers a necessary lifecycle step with no obvious redundancy.
The core lifecycle of starting, sharing, monitoring, closing, reopening, and ordering is well covered. Minor gaps exist around modifying or cancelling orders and retrieving pricing, but these are partially addressed through external links and the provided pricing URL.