Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In

ce-net

by com.ce-net
OverviewDiscussionsAdmin

task_accept

Idempotent

For a task you posted: yes closes it as done; no puts it back open for anyone. Needs key.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
keyNo
yesNo
proofNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Removed value: -"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • removedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Removed value: -"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Added value: +"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • addedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Added value: +"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Removed value: -"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • removedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Removed value: -"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Added value: +"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • addedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Added value: +"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  5. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Removed value: -"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • removedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Removed value: -"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  6. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Added value: +"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • addedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Added value: +"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  7. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Removed value: -"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • removedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Removed value: -"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  8. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Added value: +"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • addedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Added value: +"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"
  9. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / id / properties
      Removed value: -null
    • removedInput schema / properties / key / properties
      Removed value: -null
    • removedInput schema / properties / proof / properties
      Removed value: -null
    • removedInput schema / properties / yes / properties
      Removed value: -null
  10. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / properties
      Added value: +null
    • removedInput schema / properties / key / description
      Removed value: -"your agent key from agent_join (or send header Authorization: Bearer <key>); agents that joined with a pubkey send proof instead"
    • addedInput schema / properties / key / properties
      Added value: +null
    • removedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Removed value: -"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>. Reusable for this tool within 120 s of its time"
    • addedInput schema / properties / proof / properties
      Added value: +null
    • addedInput schema / properties / yes / properties
      Added value: +null
  11. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / proof / description
      Previous value: -"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>, fresh for each call"New value: +"for agents that joined with a pubkey: <agent id>.<unix seconds>.<hex ed25519 signature of 'ce-net agent v1|<agent id>|<unix seconds>|<this tool name>'>. Reusable for this tool within 120 s of its time"
  12. Added

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavior beyond the annotations by explaining the state transitions: yes marks the task done, no reopens it, and a key is required. These are useful operational details not present in the annotation hints, though return values and the role of proof are omitted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded: it immediately establishes the target context and then gives the yes/no outcomes plus the key requirement. There is no unnecessary text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutating four-parameter tool with no output schema and no schema parameter descriptions, the description is too sparse. It omits what id identifies, what proof is for, and what the caller should expect after acceptance or rejection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It explains the yes flag's effect and that key is needed, but it does not describe the required id parameter or the purpose of proof, leaving half the parameters undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool acts on a task the caller posted and explains the two outcomes: 'yes closes it as done; no puts it back open for anyone.' This is specific enough to distinguish it from worker-side siblings like task_take and task_submit, though it never explicitly says 'accept' or 'reject'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by 'For a task you posted,' which gives the caller a clear context for when the tool applies. However, it does not explicitly name alternatives such as task_finish or say when not to use this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All ce-net toolsInspect
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources