Skip to main content
Glama

Get a diamond

get_diamond
Read-only

Details and the latest confirmed price range for one diamond, with the date we last saw it, by its Carat Hunter id (from search_diamonds or a carathunter.com URL).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "get_diamond"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond that: the price is a 'latest confirmed price range' with the 'date we last saw it', which signals freshness semantics an agent needs for interpretation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with what is returned, followed by the freshness qualifier and the id provenance. Zero wasted clauses.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description does the right thing by naming the returned fields (details, confirmed price range, last-seen date). Only minor gap is that it does not say what happens if the id is unknown or the price is stale/absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the load, and it does: it identifies the parameter as the Carat Hunter id, an integer-like identifier, and names the two places to obtain it. It adds no format edge cases, but the essential semantics are present.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (retrieve details and latest confirmed price range) for a specific resource (one diamond), keyed by Carat Hunter id. It implicitly separates itself from search_diamonds (which produces the id) and price_check (which does not carry per-diamond detail/date context).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says the id comes from search_diamonds or a carathunter.com URL, which tells an agent the prerequisite flow. It stops short of naming when not to use it or explicitly contrasting with price_check, so no full when/when-not coverage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources