list_sites
List the sites owned by this key (name, live URL, updated time). Requires a key.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | Yes | boom_sk_ key. |
List the sites owned by this key (name, live URL, updated time). Requires a key.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| key | Yes | boom_sk_ key. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as read-only, side effects, rate limits, or error handling.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with primary action, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Missing output schema; description gives only a hint of return fields but lacks details on format, pagination, or error conditions. For a list tool with no annotations, more context is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with description of the key parameter. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'List', resource 'sites', and scope 'owned by this key'. Provides hint about returned fields (name, live URL, updated time).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Only states 'Requires a key' but does not explain when to use this tool versus siblings like get_site or list_domains.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.