Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 55%, so a significant portion of parameters (name, layerIndex, startSeconds, durationSeconds, text) lack descriptions in the schema. The tool description adds no parameter guidance beyond mentioning the default theme, which is already in the schema. It fails to compensate for the undocumented parameters, making this a weak area.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.