Skip to main content
Glama

Get Post

get_post
Read-only

Fetch a single blog post by slug or UUID, including full content, metadata, and SEO fields. One call — no need to list posts first to resolve a slug.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "get_post"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
domainNo
site_idNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the safety profile is covered and the description only needs to add context. It does add that the response includes full content, metadata and SEO fields, but says nothing about not-found behavior, visibility/status restrictions on unpublished posts, or domain/site scoping effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action and result, and the second sentence earns its place by removing a common wrong approach. No filler or restatement of the title.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description usefully enumerates the return contents, which is the right thing to spend words on. The remaining gap is the unexplained 'domain' and 'site_id' parameters for a tool whose behavior changes based on them.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the burden; it partially compensates by clarifying that 'id' accepts either a slug or a UUID, which the bare string schema does not convey. The other two parameters, 'domain' and 'site_id', are never mentioned, leaving their scoping/precedence semantics undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Fetch a single blog post') and enumerates what comes back (content, metadata, SEO fields). The word 'single' plus 'no need to list posts first' implicitly contrasts it with the sibling get_posts, so an agent can pick between them without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a clear usage cue: use this one call to resolve a slug rather than doing a list-then-fetch round trip, which points agents away from get_posts. It stops short of saying when not to use it (e.g., fetching many posts by criteria) or what happens on a missing slug.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources