Skip to main content
Glama

Autario Data Analytics Platform

search_datasets

Read-onlyIdempotent

Search the Autario data catalog. Returns dataset IDs, titles, descriptions, categories, publishers, row counts, last_refreshed_at, AND trusted ontology fields (topic, subtopic, unit, frequency, entity_type, indicator_id) when ontology confidence is high. Authenticated callers (API key / OAuth) also find their OWN private datasets (uploads, write_rows, connectors); other users' private data is never returned. Use this first to discover available datasets before querying. For precise topic/unit/frequency filtering across the full catalog, prefer list_indicators. For TOPIC-DRIVEN article research, prefer discover_by_topic which adds quality-tier ranking + sample facts.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number for pagination (default 1)
limitNoMaximum number of results to return (default 20, max 100)
queryNoSearch term to match against dataset titles, descriptions, and keywords (e.g. "GDP growth", "CO2 emissions", "unemployment rate")
formatNoOutput wire format for this MCP call. Default 'toon' (Token-Oriented Notation, fewest tokens, best for tabular rows). 'compact' = minified JSON. 'json' = pretty JSON for readability. The REST API always returns JSON regardless.
categoryNoFilter by category. Options: "Finance & Economics", "Trade", "Technology", "Health & Society", "Energy", "Environment", "Demographics", "Education", "Infrastructure"
visibilityNoWhich datasets to search: "public" catalog only, "private" only your own datasets, "both". Default: "both" when authenticated, "public" otherwise. Other users' private datasets are never returned.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. Description adds behavioral context: returns ontology fields conditionally, authenticated users see own private datasets, never others' private data. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured paragraph with key info first. Slightly verbose in listing fields but necessary for completeness. No wasted sentences.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, but description enumerates returned fields. All 6 parameters are documented with context. Privacy and ontology behavior fully disclosed. Sufficient for an AI agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% but description adds value: explains visibility default logic (public vs private based on auth) and format option usage (toon vs json). Does not simply repeat schema, but enhances understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clear verb 'search' with specific resource 'Autario data catalog'. Distinct from siblings like list_indicators and discover_by_topic, explicitly differentiating scope and use case.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit directive: 'Use this first to discover available datasets before querying.' Provides specific alternatives: 'For precise topic/unit/frequency filtering...prefer list_indicators. For TOPIC-DRIVEN article research, prefer discover_by_topic.' Also explains authentication-dependent visibility behavior.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools are strongly domain-specific with clear boundaries, especially the 360 reports and dataset/chart CRUD tools. Some overlap exists around driver analysis (find_drivers, what_matters, decompose_drivers) and dataset discovery (search_datasets, discover_by_topic, list_indicators), but the descriptions make the intended use cases mostly distinguishable.

Naming Consistency4/5

The vast majority of tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun or get_noun pattern, e.g. list_connectors, refresh_connector, query_dataset, delete_dataset. Minor deviations such as calculate, describe, bubble_or_not, what_matters, and the 360-style report names keep it from being perfectly uniform.

Tool Count2/5

48 tools is far beyond the 3-15 range and even beyond the 25-tool threshold for a heavy surface. The platform is broad and the tools are organized into domains, but the sheer number creates a high selection burden for an agent and suggests the server is trying to cover too many workflows in one toolset.

Completeness4/5

The toolset covers dataset lifecycle, chart lifecycle, data discovery, querying, statistics, app context, connectors, and admin reports remarkably well. Notable gaps are the lack of a delete_chart tool and no row-level update/delete for datasets, but agents can generally work around these or treat them as intentional platform constraints.

Resources