Skip to main content
Glama

Yogini Dasha

asterwise_get_yogini_dasha
Read-onlyIdempotent

Computes the eight-Yogini, 36-year Yogini Dasha cycle with two-level period trees and DD/MM/YYYY boundaries from birth data.

WORKFLOW: BEFORE: RECOMMENDED — asterwise_get_natal_chart — establishes birth context for interpreting Yogini lords. AFTER: asterwise_get_dasha — optional Vimshottari comparison for the same native.

INPUT CONTRACT: Tree lives at data.periods.root[] — agents must not expect a top-level data.periods array. Calendar strings in periods use DD/MM/YYYY. BirthData follows the global contract.

DO NOT CONFUSE WITH: asterwise_get_dasha — Vimshottari planet periods with data.periods[] and optional levels 1–5, not Yogini names. asterwise_get_ashtottari_dasha — 108-year system with data.periods.root[] but planet-based rows, not Yoginis.

Full output and error contract: https://docs.asterwise.com/mcp/tools/get-yogini-dasha/

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
birthYesBirth data for a single person.
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' (default) for a readable report, or 'json' for the raw structured payload.markdown

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format / description
      Added value: +"Output format: 'markdown' (default) for a readable report, or 'json' for the raw structured payload."
  2. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / date / description
      Previous value: -"Birth date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Example: '1985-11-12'"New value: +"Birth date YYYY-MM-DD."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / lat / description
      Previous value: -"Birth latitude in decimal degrees. North positive, south negative. Example: 19.0760 for Mumbai, -33.8688 for Sydney"New value: +"Latitude in decimal degrees, north positive (Mumbai 19.076)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / lon / description
      Previous value: -"Birth longitude in decimal degrees. East positive, west negative. Example: 72.8777 for Mumbai, -74.0060 for New York"New value: +"Longitude in decimal degrees, east positive (Mumbai 72.8777)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / person_name / description
      Previous value: -"Name of the person for this chart. Example: 'Arjun Mehta'"New value: +"Person's name, used in labels only."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / description
      Previous value: -"Birth time in HH:MM 24-hour format. Example: '06:45'. Omit entirely if the birth time is unknown: a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided returns false. Do not pass '00:00' for an unknown time, it is treated as a real midnight birth and returns a confidently wrong ascendant."New value: +"Birth time HH:MM (24h), e.g. '06:45'. Omit if unknown (a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided=false); never pass '00:00' for unknown."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / timezone / description
      Previous value: -"IANA timezone for the birth location. Examples: 'Asia/Kolkata' (India), 'America/New_York' (New York), 'Europe/London' (London), 'Asia/Tokyo' (Japan), 'America/Los_Angeles' (Los Angeles), 'Europe/Paris' (Paris), 'Asia/Dubai' (Dubai), 'Asia/Singapore' (Singapore), 'America/Chicago' (Chicago), 'Australia/Sydney' (Sydney). Default: Asia/Kolkata"New value: +"IANA timezone of the birth place, e.g. 'Asia/Kolkata', 'America/New_York', 'Europe/London'. Default: Asia/Kolkata"
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format / default
      Added value: +"markdown"
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "birth",
      -  "response_format"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "birth"
      +]
  3. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "pattern": "^\\d{2}:\\d{2}$",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / default
      Added value: +null
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / description
      Previous value: -"Birth time in HH:MM format (24-hour). Example: '06:45'. Use '00:00' if unknown."New value: +"Birth time in HH:MM 24-hour format. Example: '06:45'. Omit entirely if the birth time is unknown: a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided returns false. Do not pass '00:00' for an unknown time, it is treated as a real midnight birth and returns a confidently wrong ascendant."
    • removedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / pattern
      Removed value: -"^\\d{2}:\\d{2}$"
    • removedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "date",
      -  "time",
      -  "lat",
      -  "lon"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "date",
      +  "lat",
      +  "lon"
      +]
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the call read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive, so the description only needs to clarify what the computation returns. It does so by noting the period-tree location (data.periods.root[]), output date format, and a link to the full output/error contract, with no contradicting side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is organized into focused sections (main computation, workflow, input contract, and do-not-confuse) and all sentences carry useful information. It is slightly longer than necessary but remains scannable and front-loaded with the core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

It covers the key output shape (two-level tree, data.periods.root[], DD/MM/YYYY strings) and provides a link to the full contract, which is sufficient when combined with the detailed input schema and presence of an output schema. It does not need to enumerate every return field because the full contract is referenced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema itself provides complete descriptions for the birth object, coordinates, date/time, ayanamsa, timezone, and response_format, so the description adds little parameter-level guidance. The 'BirthData follows the global contract' note is generic but not misleading; output-related notes do not improve parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence clearly states that this tool computes the eight-Yogini, 36-year Yogini Dasha cycle and describes the two-level period-tree output and DD/MM/YYYY boundary format. It also explicitly distinguishes itself from the Vimshottari and Ashtottari dasha siblings, making the tool's purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives concrete workflow guidance ('BEFORE: recommended asterwise_get_natal_chart', 'AFTER: optional asterwise_get_dasha') and explicitly warns against confusing this tool with asterwise_get_dasha (Vimshottari) and asterwise_get_ashtottari_dasha (108-year system). This tells an agent when to use this tool and which sibling to choose otherwise.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources