Skip to main content
Glama

Doshas

asterwise_get_doshas
Read-onlyIdempotent

Scores twelve fixed dosha buckets from birth data and returns presence flags, typed detail objects, optional summaries, and remedy lines per dosha.

WORKFLOW: BEFORE: RECOMMENDED — asterwise_get_natal_chart — chart familiarity before dosha interpretation. AFTER: asterwise_get_remedies — classical remedial suggestions after dosha review.

INPUT CONTRACT: BirthData follows the global contract. Unknown birth time at midnight is accepted silently.

DO NOT CONFUSE WITH: asterwise_get_chart_strength — Shadbala/Vimshopaka power metrics, not dosha booleans. asterwise_get_compatibility — pair scoring including nadi_dosha flags, not the twelve natal dosha buckets.

Full output and error contract: https://docs.asterwise.com/mcp/tools/get-doshas/

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
birthYesBirth data for a single person.
response_formatNoOutput format: 'markdown' (default) for a readable report, or 'json' for the raw structured payload.markdown

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format / description
      Added value: +"Output format: 'markdown' (default) for a readable report, or 'json' for the raw structured payload."
  2. Changed8 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / date / description
      Previous value: -"Birth date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Example: '1985-11-12'"New value: +"Birth date YYYY-MM-DD."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / lat / description
      Previous value: -"Birth latitude in decimal degrees. North positive, south negative. Example: 19.0760 for Mumbai, -33.8688 for Sydney"New value: +"Latitude in decimal degrees, north positive (Mumbai 19.076)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / lon / description
      Previous value: -"Birth longitude in decimal degrees. East positive, west negative. Example: 72.8777 for Mumbai, -74.0060 for New York"New value: +"Longitude in decimal degrees, east positive (Mumbai 72.8777)."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / person_name / description
      Previous value: -"Name of the person for this chart. Example: 'Arjun Mehta'"New value: +"Person's name, used in labels only."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / description
      Previous value: -"Birth time in HH:MM 24-hour format. Example: '06:45'. Omit entirely if the birth time is unknown: a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided returns false. Do not pass '00:00' for an unknown time, it is treated as a real midnight birth and returns a confidently wrong ascendant."New value: +"Birth time HH:MM (24h), e.g. '06:45'. Omit if unknown (a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided=false); never pass '00:00' for unknown."
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / timezone / description
      Previous value: -"IANA timezone for the birth location. Examples: 'Asia/Kolkata' (India), 'America/New_York' (New York), 'Europe/London' (London), 'Asia/Tokyo' (Japan), 'America/Los_Angeles' (Los Angeles), 'Europe/Paris' (Paris), 'Asia/Dubai' (Dubai), 'Asia/Singapore' (Singapore), 'America/Chicago' (Chicago), 'Australia/Sydney' (Sydney). Default: Asia/Kolkata"New value: +"IANA timezone of the birth place, e.g. 'Asia/Kolkata', 'America/New_York', 'Europe/London'. Default: Asia/Kolkata"
    • addedInput schema / properties / response_format / default
      Added value: +"markdown"
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "birth",
      -  "response_format"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "birth"
      +]
  3. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / anyOf
      Added value: +[
      +  {
      +    "pattern": "^\\d{2}:\\d{2}$",
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • addedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / default
      Added value: +null
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / description
      Previous value: -"Birth time in HH:MM format (24-hour). Example: '06:45'. Use '00:00' if unknown."New value: +"Birth time in HH:MM 24-hour format. Example: '06:45'. Omit entirely if the birth time is unknown: a sunrise chart is used and birth_time_provided returns false. Do not pass '00:00' for an unknown time, it is treated as a real midnight birth and returns a confidently wrong ascendant."
    • removedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / pattern
      Removed value: -"^\\d{2}:\\d{2}$"
    • removedInput schema / properties / birth / properties / time / type
      Removed value: -"string"
    • changedInput schema / properties / birth / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "date",
      -  "time",
      -  "lat",
      -  "lon"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "date",
      +  "lat",
      +  "lon"
      +]
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.9/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral details not covered by annotations, such as 'Unknown birth time at midnight is accepted silently,' and clarifies output types like 'presence flags, typed detail objects, optional summaries, and remedy lines.' These enrich the readOnlyHint and idempotentHint already present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with clear sections (WORKFLOW, INPUT CONTRACT, DO NOT CONFUSE WITH), each serving a distinct purpose. It is concise yet comprehensive, avoiding redundancy while covering essential operational aspects.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description includes the input contract, workflow context, differentiation from siblings, and a link to the full output/error contract. Given the tool's moderate complexity, this provides sufficient context for correct usage without needing to restate every schema detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

While the schema already provides detailed descriptions for parameters, the description adds valuable semantics by noting that omitting birth time uses a sunrise chart and sets birth_time_provided=false, clarifying the behavior for the 'time' field. This goes beyond the schema's basic default description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Scores twelve fixed dosha buckets from birth data and returns presence flags, typed detail objects, optional summaries, and remedy lines per dosha.' It also explicitly differentiates from similar tools like asterwise_get_chart_strength and asterwise_get_compatibility, making its unique purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit when-to-use guidance with 'WORKFLOW: BEFORE: RECOMMENDED — asterwise_get_natal_chart' and 'AFTER: asterwise_get_remedies.' It also includes a 'DO NOT CONFUSE WITH' section that names alternatives and explains why they should not be chosen instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources