Skip to main content
Glama

Analyze Water Consumption

analyze_water_consumption
Read-onlyIdempotent

Reconcile master-meter water/sewer consumption against tenant sub-meter totals.

``location`` (optional): a Rent Manager Location ID, a comma-separated
list, or ``"all"`` to run across every Location on this connection (see
``list_locations``). Blank = all Locations if the connection has several,
else its only Location. Output is labelled per Location; a Location that
can't be reached is listed as skipped. IDs (property, tenant, ...) belong
to one Location, so pass that Location when you filter by one.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
end_dateNo
locationNo
portfolioNo
start_dateNo
property_idsNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / location
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": "",
      +  "title": "Location",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

B3.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is clear. The description adds useful operational behavior: output is labeled per Location, unreachable Locations are listed as skipped, and blank location means all Locations or the only Location.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in the first sentence, and the remaining text is focused on location behavior. It is efficient, though the detailed location explanation is somewhat unbalanced against the undocumented date and property parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core purpose and location semantics, and an output schema exists so return values need not be explained. However, with five optional parameters at 0% schema description coverage, the lack of guidance for start_date, end_date, portfolio, and property_ids leaves the tool under-specified for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry parameter meaning. It explains location carefully, but the other four parameters, end_date, start_date, portfolio, and property_ids, are not described at all, leaving most of the schema undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: reconcile master-meter water/sewer consumption against tenant sub-meter totals. This is clear enough for an agent to understand the operation, though it does not explicitly differentiate the tool from related meter-reading siblings such as get_meter_reads.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains the location parameter's behavior and points to list_locations for IDs, but it gives no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance versus alternatives. The intended usage is implied by the reconciliation purpose rather than stated as routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources