Skip to main content
Glama

Arc & Ledger Tax Reference

Screen an ITIN reason and application path

check_itin_eligibility
Read-only

Use to screen general ITIN reason categories, whether a return is commonly attached, and supporting-document requirements. Never request or process an actual ITIN, passport, or identity document.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
reasonYesWhy you think a US taxpayer ID may be needed. file_us_tax_return = you must file a US return; owner_of_us_llc = you own a US LLC or corporation, which does not by itself establish a personal ITIN need; claim_treaty_benefit = a treaty claim may require a TIN; spouse_or_dependent = a US return may need a spouse or dependent TIN; third_party_withholding = a payer has a reporting or withholding requirement; open_us_bank_or_other = another reason.
has_ssnYesWhether you already have, or are eligible for, a US Social Security Number. If yes, you cannot get an ITIN.
is_foreign_nationalNoWhether you are a non-US citizen without US immigration status that grants an SSN. Defaults to true.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
relayYesInstruction to the calling assistant: relay figures and dates verbatim (identical on every response).
next_stepYesA single review link appropriate to this server surface.
disclaimerYesGeneral-information disclaimer (identical on every response).
source_urlYesOfficial IRS or FinCEN authority to review before relying on the result.
server_versionNoServer release that produced this response (matches GET /version).

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds valuable context: it explicitly forbids requesting or processing actual identity documents, which is a behavioral constraint beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, each serving a distinct purpose: one states what the tool does, the other sets a critical boundary. No wasted words, front-loaded key action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple nature of the tool and the existence of an output schema, the description sufficiently covers the screening functionality, constraints, and purpose. No gaps identified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds a high-level purpose but does not enhance parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides for each field.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool screens ITIN reason categories, return attachment, and document requirements. It uses specific verbs and resource ('screen general ITIN reason categories') and distinguishes from sibling tools which focus on other tax checks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use to screen' and includes a strong boundary ('Never request or process an actual ITIN...'). It implies when to use this tool for ITIN eligibility screening versus other sibling tools, though it does not explicitly name alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool addresses a distinct tax topic or action, such as screening obligations, checking eligibility, estimating amounts, or explaining documents. There is no overlap in purpose, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun or verb_phrase pattern (e.g., check_*, estimate_*, explain_*, decode_*, deadline_calendar). The naming is predictable and clear across the set.

Tool Count5/5

With 13 tools, the server covers a broad range of tax reference needs without being overwhelming. Each tool has a clear purpose and the count is well-suited for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The tools cover common tax reference tasks like screening obligations, estimating penalties, explaining forms, and checking deadlines. A minor gap is the lack of a general tax liability estimator, but overall the set is comprehensive for its stated purpose.