Skip to main content
Glama

Get several app listings at once

app_metrics_metadata_batch
Read-only

Fetch store listings for a list of package ids in one call — the bulk form of app_metrics_metadata. Use it when comparing apps, instead of one call per app. Costs 8 credits.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "store": "<store>",
      "country": "<country>",
      "packages": "<packages>"
    },
    "name": "app_metrics_metadata_batch"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
storeYesWhich app store: "android" (Google Play) or "ios" (App Store).
countryYesTwo-letter ISO country code, e.g. "US", "GB", "DE".
packagesYesApp package / bundle ids, up to 20, e.g. ["com.discord", "com.spotify.music"].

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so safety and external-data behavior are covered. The description adds useful non-schema context by stating that this is a bulk operation and costs 8 credits, though it does not discuss partial failures or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two tight sentences with the core purpose and batch guidance front-loaded. The cost note is short and useful, with no wasted wording.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple three-parameter read-only tool with full schema coverage and annotations, the description gives enough context to call it correctly. It does not describe the return shape, but no output schema exists and the tool remains understandable without that detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so store, country, and packages are already fully documented in the schema. The description mentions a list of package ids, but adds no syntax or format detail beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: fetch store listings for a list of package ids. It also clarifies that this is the bulk form of app_metrics_metadata, making it easy to distinguish from the single-app sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says to use this when comparing apps and instead of making one call per app. Naming app_metrics_metadata as the single-app form gives the agent a clear alternative.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.