get_building_block
One building block by type + slug; include=["content"] returns the full body.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | ||
| type | Yes | ||
| include | No |
One building block by type + slug; include=["content"] returns the full body.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | Yes | ||
| type | Yes | ||
| include | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Discloses that including 'content' returns full body, but does not describe default return structure, error behavior, or other nuances. Without annotations, carries moderate burden.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with core purpose, no redundant words. Excellent conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple retrieval tool with three params and no output schema. Covers essential lookup and optional full body, but lacks default response details.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Adds meaning to parameters: slug and type as lookup keys, include as content trigger. Since schema has 0% coverage, this compensation is valuable, though default response is unspecified.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the tool retrieves a single building block by type and slug, distinguishing it from sibling 'find_building_blocks' which implies multiple results.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'find_building_blocks'. The description only states what it does without context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.