Skip to main content
Glama

developer.license-audit

Read-onlyIdempotent

Classify software dependency licenses and flag packages that need commercial or legal review.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
policyNocommercial
dependenciesYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesStructured License compatibility audit result
metaYes
serviceYes
versionYes
request_idYesUnique request identifier

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed7 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions / items / properties / checkout_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "pattern": "^/try/",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions / items / properties / executes_automatically
      Added value: +{
      +  "const": false,
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions / items / properties / handoff_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Free full contract and spend-capped command handoff; reading it does not execute or purchase the follow-up.",
      +  "pattern": "^/catalog/",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions / items / properties / handoff_payment_required
      Added value: +{
      +  "const": false,
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions / items / properties / maximum_atomic_usdc
      Added value: +{
      +  "pattern": "^[1-9][0-9]*$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions / items / properties / sample_path
      Added value: +{
      +  "pattern": "^/samples/",
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions / items / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "service",
      -  "title",
      -  "reason",
      -  "method",
      -  "path",
      -  "price",
      -  "input_template",
      -  "use_output",
      -  "authorization_required"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "service",
      +  "title",
      +  "reason",
      +  "method",
      +  "path",
      +  "price",
      +  "input_template",
      +  "use_output",
      +  "handoff_path",
      +  "checkout_path",
      +  "sample_path",
      +  "maximum_atomic_usdc",
      +  "handoff_payment_required",
      +  "executes_automatically",
      +  "authorization_required"
      +]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / meta / properties / next_actions
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional separately priced follow-up calls. Each action requires a new payment challenge and explicit buyer authorization.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "properties": {
      +      "authorization_required": {
      +        "const": true,
      +        "type": "boolean"
      +      },
      +      "input_template": {
      +        "description": "Client-side template only: $request refers to the original input, $result to this response, and $json(...) serializes its argument. The server does not execute the follow-up.",
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "method": {
      +        "const": "POST",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "path": {
      +        "pattern": "^/v1/",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "price": {
      +        "pattern": "^\\$[0-9]+",
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "reason": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "service": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "title": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "use_output": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      }
      +    },
      +    "required": [
      +      "service",
      +      "title",
      +      "reason",
      +      "method",
      +      "path",
      +      "price",
      +      "input_template",
      +      "use_output",
      +      "authorization_required"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / properties / meta / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "duration_ms",
      -  "cached",
      -  "sources",
      -  "warnings"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "duration_ms",
      +  "cached",
      +  "sources",
      +  "warnings",
      +  "next_actions"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, covering the safety profile. The description adds the tool's core behavior (classifying licenses, flagging review) but does not disclose additional behavioral details such as how the policy parameter affects classification, what data sources are used, or any edge cases. With annotations present, this is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It captures the essential purpose and output intent efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, annotations, and a moderately simple input schema, the description omits critical information about the 'policy' parameter, which is central to the tool's behavior. It does not clarify what 'commercial' vs 'permissive' means or how it influences the flagging. The tool is simple but the missing policy explanation makes the description incomplete for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries the full burden for explaining parameters. It does not mention 'policy' or explain its enum values ('permissive' vs 'commercial'), nor does it detail the structure of the 'dependencies' array beyond implying the domain. The description adds minimal meaning to the parameters, leaving the policy semantics entirely unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Classify software dependency licenses and flag packages that need commercial or legal review.' It uses specific verbs ('classify', 'flag') and identifies the resource (software dependency licenses). This distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'developer.dependency-audit', which likely handles broader dependency auditing, by focusing on license compliance.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies a clear use case: when you need to classify dependency licenses and identify packages needing review. It provides context but does not explicitly exclude alternatives or name the sibling 'developer.dependency-audit' as the alternative for broader audits. Thus, it has clear context but lacks explicit when/when-not guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources