Skip to main content
Glama

AI SENSE Free Public Tools

by com.aisenseapi

Read webhook capture

read_webhook_capture
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check whether anything has been sent to a capture URL yet, and read it. The status field is pending or captured. Pending is the ordinary answer before the sender fires and is NOT a failure: call again after a pause rather than treating it as an error or giving up. This is an immediate poll, not a blocking wait. An id that was never issued also reads as pending, so stop polling once the expire_timestamp from create_webhook_capture has passed. No API key, no account and no sign up: call it directly.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
capture_idYesThe UUID that create_webhook_capture returned.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
statusYes
requestYes
capture_idYes
captured_at_datetimeYes
captured_at_timestampYes

TDQS

A5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (readOnlyHint, idempotentHint) are given, and the description adds significant behavioral context: how to interpret pending, that unseen IDs also return pending, and the fact that no API key is needed. This goes far beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Every sentence carries important operational guidance. The text is tight, well-ordered, and free of fluff, covering polling semantics, error handling, and setup all in under 100 words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-poll tool with one parameter and output schema present, the description covers all needed aspects: what it returns (status field), how to interpret outcomes (pending vs captured), retry logic, and stopping conditions. No gaps apparent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes capture_id as the UUID from create_webhook_capture. The description adds that an unissued ID also appears as pending, which is critical behavioral nuance beyond the schema's type definition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: checking and reading from a capture URL. It differentiates itself from siblings by calling out the polling behavior and the non-error pending state, which is a unique characteristic.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives explicit usage guidance: it's an immediate poll, not blocking, and pending is not an error. It instructs to retry with a pause and to stop polling after expire_timestamp, referencing create_webhook_capture for the deadline.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AI SENSE Free Public Tools toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Each tool is centered on a distinct resource or action, and the read_* tools clearly map to their create_* counterparts. The main source of ambiguity is create_agent_wake, which overlaps conceptually with create_human_approval and create_webhook_capture because it also involves webhooks and human form replies.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with clear create_*/read_* pairs and standalone helpers like generate_uuid and get_current_time. No mixed casing or arbitrary verb styles appear.

Tool Count5/5

Ten tools is a well-scoped size for a general-purpose public utility server. Each tool covers a distinct need, and the collection feels intentionally curated rather than bloated or sparse.

Completeness4/5

The create/read pairs provide reasonable coverage for approvals, webhook capture, and temporary storage, plus useful standalone utilities. The noticeable gaps are missing cancellation, deletion, or status operations for agent wakes and temporary resources, but these do not severely cripple typical workflows.

Resources