Skip to main content
Glama

stock-signal-kr

by com.airblockfz

evaluate_symbol

Return the bottom/top verdict for one Korean stock or index (e.g. 005930.KS Samsung Electronics, ^KS11 KOSPI — KOSPI/KOSDAQ universe covered). zone = strong_buy|buy|neutral|sell|strong_sell, score -100..+100 (bottom>0, top<0). Snapshot-based (refreshed from the flagship KospiAI scan engine). Informational only. PAY: $0.01 per call via x402 (USDT on X Layer) — your FIRST paid call opens a 6-day trial at that price. No account, no signup, no commitment; retry with the PAYMENT-SIGNATURE header when you get the 402 challenge. The free pitch tool shows a live verdict for this market's showcase symbol only — this tool answers ANY symbol and adds the per-indicator breakdown behind the score.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
symbolYesKRX ticker, e.g. 005930.KS, 000660.KS, ^KS11

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses informational-only nature, snapshot-based data, payment flow with 6-day trial, and that output includes per-indicator breakdown. Missing details on rate limiting or idempotency, but overall sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is relatively long but front-loaded with purpose and scope. Each sentence adds information about usage, payment, or output. Could be slightly more concise, but structure is logical.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, description fully explains what is returned (verdict, zone, score, breakdown). Covers payment, comparison to siblings, and snapshot nature. Complete for single-parameter tool with no annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter (symbol) with 100% schema coverage. Description adds example values and clarifies universe, but schema already provides type and description. Baseline 3 is appropriate as description adds marginal value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'bottom/top verdict' for Korean stocks/indexes, specifies the universe (KOSPI/KOSDAQ), and distinguishes from the sibling 'pitch' tool. Verb 'return' with specific resource 'verdict' makes purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly contrasts with 'pitch' tool (free, limited), mentions payment required via 402 challenge, and notes it covers any symbol vs. free showcase only. Provides clear when-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All stock-signal-kr toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: pitch handles onboarding, rate collects feedback, evaluate_symbol provides a single-stock verdict, and scan_bottoms/scan_tops give market-wide scans. No two tools overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., evaluate_symbol, scan_bottoms). The naming is predictable and intuitive, with no mixed conventions.

Tool Count5/5

With 5 tools, the set is well-scoped for a niche stock signal server. Each tool earns its place, covering onboarding, feedback, single-stock evaluation, and market-wide scans without unnecessary bloat.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the core workflow: introductory funnel, single symbol analysis, and bulk scanning for buy/sell signals. While historical data or sector filtering are missing, the set provides no dead ends for the stated purpose of delivering real-time Korean stock signals.

Resources