Skip to main content
Glama

Read the trust checklist

get_trust_checklist
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return the agent trust checklist for agentpaywire.com: commitments on stable URLs, errors and limits, and naming, each with status met or partial and evidence URLs, plus the paid API's error codes, rate-limit policy, credit terms, and the list of MCP tools. Use it to judge whether the site and its paid API are dependable or to look up an error code. Use get_support_info for donation addresses and payment methods. Use get_protocol_facts for third-party protocols. Free, no auth.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes
titleYes
toolsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "items": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "properties": {
      +          "id": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "status": {
      +            "enum": [
      +              "met",
      +              "partial"
      +            ],
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "id",
      +          "status"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "title": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "tools": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "type": "string"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "title",
      +    "items",
      +    "tools"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish safe read-only, idempotent, open-world behavior. The description adds useful non-schema context such as 'Free, no auth' and enumerates the returned trust-checklist contents, though it does not add freshness or caching details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but front-loaded: the main return value comes first, then use cases and alternatives, ending with access terms. Every clause adds useful routing or content information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, rich annotations, and a present output schema, the description supplies all needed context: what is returned, when to use it, and which sibling tools handle adjacent needs. Nothing important is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so parameter semantics are inherently simple. The description does not need to explain inputs, and a baseline of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: returns the agent trust checklist for agentpaywire.com, and summarizes the included commitments, evidence, API error codes, rate limits, credit terms, and MCP tool list. It clearly distinguishes itself from get_support_info and get_protocol_facts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says to use it to judge site/API dependability or look up an error code, and directly routes donation/payment questions to get_support_info and third-party protocol questions to get_protocol_facts. Both when-to-use and alternatives are present.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources