earnings
Next earnings date for a symbol, or a rolling calendar window
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | No | ||
| symbol | No |
Next earnings date for a symbol, or a rolling calendar window
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| days | No | ||
| symbol | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description bears full burden. It hints at output (next earnings date, rolling window) but does not disclose whether it is read-only, rate limits, or what happens with null parameters.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no filler. Every word contributes to the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, the description omits output format, edge cases, and how the two parameters interact. More detail is needed for the agent to invoke correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description loosely implies 'symbol' is a ticker and 'days' controls the window, but adds no precise meaning beyond parameter names. Does not explain defaults or behavior when omitted.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves the next earnings date for a symbol or a rolling calendar window. It specifies the resource (earnings date) and distinguishes from sibling tools like calendar or candles.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites, when not to use, or related tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.