Skip to main content
Glama

T54 x402 request (generic)

t54_x402_request
Idempotent

Execute any T54 seller operation by operationId with an optional query map. Prefer per-operation t54_* tools when available for clearer arguments. On HTTP 402, x402_broker_client pays then retries.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
queryNoQuery string parameters as a JSON object. Keys must match OpenAPI query names for this operation (see resource openapi://agentic-swarm-t54-skus).
operation_idYesExact OpenAPI operationId. Call t54_list_operations first. Known: agentCommerceData, airdropIntelligence, constitutionAuditLite, getHealth, helloPing, peerOriginVerify, researchBrief, structuredQuery

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / operation_id / description
      Previous value: -"Exact OpenAPI operationId. Call t54_list_operations first. Known: agentCommerceData, airdropIntelligence, constitutionAuditLite, getHealth, helloPing, researchBrief, structuredQuery"New value: +"Exact OpenAPI operationId. Call t54_list_operations first. Known: agentCommerceData, airdropIntelligence, constitutionAuditLite, getHealth, helloPing, peerOriginVerify, researchBrief, structuredQuery"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / query / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "type": "object"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
  3. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / query / anyOf
      Previous value: -[
      -  {
      -    "additionalProperties": true,
      -    "type": "object"
      -  },
      -  {
      -    "type": "null"
      -  }
      -]New value: +[
      +  {
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  {
      +    "type": "null"
      +  }
      +]
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -{
      -  "properties": {
      -    "result": {
      -      "title": "Result",
      -      "type": "string"
      -    }
      -  },
      -  "required": [
      -    "result"
      -  ],
      -  "title": "t54_x402_requestOutput",
      -  "type": "object"
      -}New value: +null
  4. First observed

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly=false, idempotent=true, openWorld=true, and destructive=false. The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond those flags, especially the HTTP 402 behavior where x402_broker_client pays and retries. No annotation contradiction is present.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three tight sentences with no filler: one states the core function, one gives routing guidance, one discloses error/retry behavior. Each sentence earns its place and the most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a generic execution tool with no output schema, it adequately covers tool selection, operation lookup, parameter handling, and a key error case. A minor gap is that it does not hint at what the response shape will be, though that is inherently operation-dependent and likely documented via t54_list_operations or per-operation tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema itself already explains both operation_id and query in detail, including the known operationId values and the need to call t54_list_operations first. The description adds little beyond repeating 'optional query map', so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action ('Execute any T54 seller operation by operationId') and clearly marks itself as the generic fallback relative to the per-operation t54_* siblings. The title 'generic' and the instruction to prefer per-operation tools make its role unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent to prefer per-operation t54_* tools when available, and to call t54_list_operations first to obtain the exact operationId. This directly resolves the main selection question: when to use this generic tool versus its siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources