Skip to main content
Glama

Agentalog — Agent Auto Log

Listing security

listing_security
Read-onlyIdempotent

Read a remote MCP server or SKILL.md review before installing. MCP: server, domain, tools and measured signals. Skill: static findings with file, line, excerpt and context; no command execution or referenced-script review. Unread skills stay unchecked. Read the limits in aviso. Take the id from list_listings. We visit remote MCP servers: initialize and tools/list, without credentials or tool calls, again 7 days after a success. A failure needs a second check. MCP signals: dns_morto, sem_https, tls_invalido, tunel, nao_responde, nao_mcp, texto_suspeito, redireciona_fora, repo_arquivado, repo_parado, dominio_recente, login, bloqueado. For skills, tipo: skill identifies a static SKILL.md review. It flags secret reads, download-and-execute commands, external uploads, invisible characters, long encoded text and broad allowed-tools. revisao.achados supplies the path, original line, excerpt and context. Examples and prohibitions do not raise the level. Excerpts hide sensitive values. The review does not run commands or follow references. Supported source: public raw.githubusercontent.com SKILL.md. Watched, visited, starred and new skills get priority within the shared GitHub governor and a daily cap. Unread or unsupported skills remain explicitly unchecked. Local MCP servers and plugins answer not_remote. No request fetches a third-party source. Cached for 5 minutes.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesListing ID, from `Anuncio.id`.
retry_keyNoOptional retry key, up to 80 ASCII characters; same read for five minutes.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / api_pass
      Removed value: -{
      -  "description": "MAT-only private pass: mat_<32 random hex>_<64 random hex>. Generate and save before buying.",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With readOnlyHint/idempotentHint already declaring the safety profile, the description adds substantial context beyond annotations: no credentials or tool calls, `initialize`+`tools/list` probing, 7-day recheck after success, second check on failure, 5-minute cache, daily cap and shared GitHub governor, and `not_remote` for local servers/plugins.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded and the telegraphic style is efficient, but the description is very long and contains redundancy — 'no command execution or referenced-script review' is restated later as 'The review does not run commands or follow references', and the signal enum is dumped inline.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the return-value burden and does so thoroughly: it names the MCP signal codes, describes `revisao.achados` fields (path, line, excerpt, context), the `tipo: skill` marker, and the explicit 'unchecked'/'not_remote' outcomes. Nothing an agent needs to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds real value: it tells the agent where the required `id` comes from ('Take the id from list_listings') and ties the 5-minute cache to the read semantics of `retry_key`, both of which go beyond the schema text.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource — 'Read a remote MCP server or SKILL.md review' — and splits it into the two distinct result shapes (MCP signals vs. static skill findings). This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like get_listing, listing_status, and list_listings without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives the trigger ('before installing'), routes the agent to the id source ('Take the id from list_listings'), and points to 'the limits in aviso'. It is clear context but stops short of explicitly naming an alternative tool or stating when NOT to use it, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.