Skip to main content
Glama

Pause Recurring Post

pause_recurring_post
DestructiveIdempotent

Pause a recurring post: it stops creating occurrences and deletes its upcoming SCHEDULED post, preventing future scheduled occurrences until resume_recurring_post; an occurrence already publishing may still complete. Posts already published are kept. Slots that pass while paused are skipped, never published later. Use it when the user wants to hold the series; use delete_recurring_post to stop it for good. Deleting only the upcoming post with delete_post skips that one date and the series continues. Ids outside the workspace (the current one unless workspaceId names another) return "Recurring post not found". Returns the recurring post with status PAUSED and pauseReason USER.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesRecurring post ID to pause, from list_recurring_posts
workspaceIdNoWorkspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to act in the workspace list_workspaces marks current. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace (accounts, posts, uploads) do not exist in another

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultNoThe paused recurring post: id, status PAUSED, pauseReason USER, the schedule, occurrenceCount, and the content and platforms.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • removedOutput schema / $schema
      Removed value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / workspaceId / description
      Previous value: -"Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace (accounts, posts, uploads) do not exist in another"New value: +"Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to act in the workspace list_workspaces marks current. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace (accounts, posts, uploads) do not exist in another"
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / workspaceId
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to use the default workspace. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace (accounts, posts, uploads) do not exist in another",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Added

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds substantial behavior beyond the annotations: the upcoming scheduled post is deleted, an in-flight publishing occurrence may still complete, already-published posts are kept, and skipped slots are never backfilled. It also documents the not-found error for out-of-workspace ids and the returned status/pauseReason, which the destructiveHint/idempotentHint annotations cannot convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core action and its immediate side effect, then the usage routing, then edge cases. Dense but every sentence carries distinct information; slightly long, though nothing is filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, the description need not restate the return shape, and it still summarizes status PAUSED/pauseReason USER. Combined with annotations (destructive, idempotent) and full schema coverage, an agent has everything needed to call it correctly and predict consequences.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description still adds value by explaining workspace scoping (ids outside the current/other workspace yield 'Recurring post not found') and reinforcing that id comes from list_recurring_posts. This goes modestly beyond the schema's own parameter text.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource (pause a recurring post) and immediately clarifies the scope: it stops occurrence creation and deletes the upcoming SCHEDULED post. It explicitly contrasts with delete_recurring_post, resume_recurring_post, and delete_post, so an agent can distinguish it from every relevant sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use ('when the user wants to hold the series'), when-not ('use delete_recurring_post to stop it for good'), and the alternative for a one-off skip (delete_post). The selection logic between pause vs delete vs single-skip is fully spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources