AdaptlyPost

Delete Review Reply

delete_inbox_review_reply

DestructiveIdempotent

Delete the location's reply to a Google review; the review itself stays. It cannot be undone, so confirm with the user first, quoting the reply. A 403 with code inbox_reconnect_required means the account lacks the platform permission for this channel or action (some channels still wait on platform review) or its token expired: tell the user to reconnect the account in AdaptlyPost and do not retry. 404 inbox_item_not_found means the id is unknown in this workspace. 429 inbox_rate_limited means the platform rate limited the call: wait a while before trying again. 503 inbox_platform_error means the platform failed: try again later. Needs the inbox.reply permission, which Admin and Editor hold (403 permission_denied otherwise), and an active plan.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "delete_inbox_review_reply"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`id`	Yes	The review id, from list_inbox_reviews
`workspaceId`	No	Workspace to act in: an id from list_workspaces. Omit to act in the workspace list_workspaces marks current. Use the same workspaceId for every call about the same workspace, since ids from one workspace (accounts, posts, uploads) do not exist in another

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`result`	Yes	The review with reply: null. An InboxReview: id, accountId, platform (GOOGLE_BUSINESS), accountName, platformReviewId, reviewer { name, avatarUrl, isAnonymous }, rating (1 to 5), text, reply ({ text, updatedAt } or null), createdAt, updatedAt, status, repliedAt, maxReplyLength and capabilities { canReply }.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed4 schema fields changedNov 9, 2026

addedOutput schema / properties / result / additionalProperties
```
Added value: +true
```

addedOutput schema / properties / result / properties

Added value: +{
+  "accountId": {
+    "description": "The account `id` from GET /social-accounts",
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "accountName": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "capabilities": {
+    "anyOf": [
+      {
+        "additionalProperties": true,
+        "properties": {
+          "canReply": {
+            "type": [
+              "boolean",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          }
+        },
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "null"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "createdAt": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "id": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "maxReplyLength": {
+    "description": "In UTF-8 bytes",
+    "type": [
+      "number",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "platform": {
+    "description": "One of: FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, THREADS, TIKTOK, TWITTER, BLUESKY, LINKEDIN, PINTEREST, YOUTUBE, MASTODON, TELEGRAM, GOOGLE_BUSINESS, TUMBLR, WORDPRESS",
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "platformReviewId": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "rating": {
+    "type": [
+      "number",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "repliedAt": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "reply": {
+    "anyOf": [
+      {
+        "additionalProperties": true,
+        "properties": {
+          "text": {
+            "type": [
+              "string",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          },
+          "updatedAt": {
+            "type": [
+              "string",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          }
+        },
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "null"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "reviewer": {
+    "anyOf": [
+      {
+        "additionalProperties": true,
+        "properties": {
+          "avatarUrl": {
+            "type": [
+              "string",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          },
+          "isAnonymous": {
+            "type": [
+              "boolean",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          },
+          "name": {
+            "type": [
+              "string",
+              "null"
+            ]
+          }
+        },
+        "type": "object"
+      },
+      {
+        "type": "null"
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  "status": {
+    "description": "One of: UNREAD, READ, DONE",
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "text": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  },
+  "updatedAt": {
+    "type": [
+      "string",
+      "null"
+    ]
+  }
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / result / type
```
Added value: +"object"
```
addedOutput schema / required
```
Added value: +[
+  "result"
+]
```

AddedNov 8, 2026

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the destructiveHint/openWorldHint annotations: it declares irreversibility, requires user confirmation, and enumerates concrete failure semantics (inbox_reconnect_required, 404, 429, 503) with an explicit 'do not retry' instruction for the 403 case. Permission model (inbox.reply held by Admin and Editor) and plan requirement are also disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and destructiveness are front-loaded in the first sentence, and the remaining text is a compact error/permission reference. Dense but every clause carries operational value; only the error catalogue length keeps it from a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive mutation with output schema available, the definition covers the missing pieces an agent needs: irreversibility, confirmation workflow, auth/permission failure modes, rate limiting, and retry behavior. Nothing essential to correct invocation is absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so id and workspaceId are already documented in the schema, including the cross-workspace id caveat. The description adds only an indirect note via '404 inbox_item_not_found means the id is unknown in this workspace', so it neither compensates for a gap nor adds much new parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Delete the location's reply to a Google review') and immediately disambiguates scope with 'the review itself stays', which separates it from deleting the review or from reply_to_inbox_review without any schema lookups.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an explicit precondition for invocation ('confirm with the user first, quoting the reply') plus the permission and plan prerequisites. It does not name sibling alternatives such as reply_to_inbox_review, but the irreversible-delete context makes the when-to-use boundary clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AdaptlyPost tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?