Skip to main content
Glama

Get phone call

get_call
Read-onlyIdempotent

One call's status, transcript and cost. Leave out call_id for the latest call.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_call"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
call_idNoFrom list_calls, place_call or an attention item.
project_idNoWorkspace to work in (from list_projects). Leave out for the default one.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds value by disclosing the returned payload (status, transcript, cost) and the fallback semantics when call_id is omitted, though it says nothing about pagination of long transcripts or error behavior for invalid IDs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, no filler, with the returned content front-loaded and the optional-parameter default second. Every clause carries information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description at least enumerates the return fields and explains the optional-parameter default, which is enough to invoke the tool correctly. It is thin on handling of a missing/unknown call_id and on transcript truncation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds behavior the schema does not: omitting call_id returns the latest call rather than erroring. That is a meaningful default beyond the provenance hint already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"One call's status, transcript and cost" names the resource in singular and enumerates what it returns, which cleanly separates it from the plural list_calls sibling. It is clear but relies on the name 'get_call' for the verb rather than stating it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only guidance is the default behavior "Leave out call_id for the latest call," which tells the agent how to call it but not when to prefer it over list_calls or other get_* tools. Usage is implied rather than stated with alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.