Skip to main content
Glama

Pin to my page

pin_to_page
Idempotent

Pin one of the user's titles to the top of their public page (up to 3 pins), optionally answering a prompt ("The one I'd save in a fire", or their own) and with a short line. On a title already pinned, changes its prompt or line.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "media_type": "<media_type>"
    },
    "name": "pin_to_page"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
lineNoA short line of their own about it; empty clears it
titleNoExact title in their library
promptNoThe prompt the pin answers, up to 80 characters; empty clears it
item_idNoLibrary item id (UUID); use instead of title
media_typeYesType of media

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / media_type / enum
      Previous value: -[
      -  "book",
      -  "movie",
      -  "album",
      -  "show",
      -  "anime",
      -  "podcast",
      -  "game",
      -  "manga"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "book",
      +  "movie",
      +  "album",
      +  "show",
      +  "anime",
      +  "podcast",
      +  "game",
      +  "manga",
      +  "comic"
      +]
  2. Added

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (non-read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, open-world), the description discloses public visibility, the three-pin limit, optional prompt/line fields, and update-in-place behavior. It omits permission requirements and what happens when the pin limit is reached, but adds substantial domain behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight clauses: the pin action with its constraints is front-loaded, followed by the update behavior. There is no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, domain rules, and mutation semantics for a five-parameter tool with full schema coverage and annotations. Missing only explicit sibling routing for removal and edge-case limit behavior, which are minor given the structured fields.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all five parameters, including empty-clears behavior and item_id versus title. The description only adds prompt examples such as 'The one I'd save in a fire' and reinforces prompt/line editing, which is marginal beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (pin), resource (one of the user's titles) and destination (top of their public page), plus the three-pin cap and update behavior. This clearly distinguishes it from unpin_from_page and other page-setting siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explains the main scenario and that calling it on an already-pinned title edits the prompt or line instead of creating a duplicate. It does not explicitly route removal to unpin_from_page or clarify when to prefer item_id over title, leaving some guidance to the schema and sibling names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources