Skip to main content
Glama

Stablecoin Scanner

get_recent_transactions

Read-onlyIdempotent

Recent stablecoin transfers on one chain, newest first, filterable by payer and/or recipient, cursor-paginated. Use it for the latest transfers of an address or of the whole chain, with a tx_hash to cite. Not for who an address settles with over time: get_wallet_graph_walk. Not for how fresh the feed is: get_sync_status. Not for any verdict about an address: get_address_risk. Answer: items[], each row tx_hash, log_index, block_number, block_time (RFC 3339), payer, recipient, amount {amount (minor units, string), decimals, token (symbol)}, token (the contract address), finality, and usd_amount where priced. The chain is the one asked for — rows do not repeat it. payer and recipient narrow together; omit both for the chain-wide feed; pass next_cursor back unchanged as cursor for older rows, and a page without it is the last. Heavy read: under load it answers busy or timeout — retry with backoff. No auth; 1200 requests/min shared by all tools. Plain on-chain Transfer facts, no scoring.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
chainNoChain of the feed, in any of four spellings: the id (8453 Base — default, 1 Ethereum, 10 Optimism, 42161 Arbitrum, 56 BNB Chain, 728126428 Tron, -1 Solana), the same id as a string, the network slug (base, ethereum, optimism, arbitrum, bnb-chain, tron, solana) or its CAIP-2 id (eip155:1, solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp). Surrounding whitespace, a leading + and leading zeros are ignored, a JSON number counts by its value (1.0 is 1), slugs and CAIP-2 ids match in any letter case, and an empty, blank or null chain is no chain at all. Anything else (hex, a decimal fraction, a zero-padded CAIP-2 reference) is refused, and so is a network this scanner knows but does not index. Without chain, a T… or base58 payer/recipient filter selects Tron or Solana; otherwise Base. The rows do not repeat the chain: it is the one asked for
limitNoMax rows, 1..200 (default 25). A value outside that range is refused, as REST refuses it
payerNoFilter by payer address: 0x… (EVM), T… (Tron) or base58 (Solana)
cursorNoPagination cursor from a previous response
recipientNoFilter by recipient address: 0x… (EVM), T… (Tron) or base58 (Solana)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / chain / description
      Previous value: -"Chain of the feed, in any of four spellings: the id (8453 Base — default, 1 Ethereum, 10 Optimism, 42161 Arbitrum, 56 BNB Chain, 728126428 Tron, -1 Solana), the same id as a string, the network slug (base, ethereum, optimism, arbitrum, bnb-chain, tron, solana) or its CAIP-2 id (eip155:1, solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp). Unknown spellings are refused, and so is a network this scanner knows but does not index. Without chain, a T… or base58 payer/recipient filter selects Tron or Solana; otherwise Base. The rows do not repeat the chain: it is the one asked for"New value: +"Chain of the feed, in any of four spellings: the id (8453 Base — default, 1 Ethereum, 10 Optimism, 42161 Arbitrum, 56 BNB Chain, 728126428 Tron, -1 Solana), the same id as a string, the network slug (base, ethereum, optimism, arbitrum, bnb-chain, tron, solana) or its CAIP-2 id (eip155:1, solana:5eykt4UsFv8P8NJdTREpY1vzqKqZKvdp). Surrounding whitespace, a leading + and leading zeros are ignored, a JSON number counts by its value (1.0 is 1), slugs and CAIP-2 ids match in any letter case, and an empty, blank or null chain is no chain at all. Anything else (hex, a decimal fraction, a zero-padded CAIP-2 reference) is refused, and so is a network this scanner knows but does not index. Without chain, a T… or base58 payer/recipient filter selects Tron or Solana; otherwise Base. The rows do not repeat the chain: it is the one asked for"
    • changedInput schema / properties / chain / type
      Previous value: -[
      -  "integer",
      -  "string"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "integer",
      +  "string",
      +  "null"
      +]
    • changedInput schema / properties / payer / description
      Previous value: -"Filter by payer address (0x+40hex)"New value: +"Filter by payer address: 0x… (EVM), T… (Tron) or base58 (Solana)"
    • changedInput schema / properties / recipient / description
      Previous value: -"Filter by recipient address (0x+40hex)"New value: +"Filter by recipient address: 0x… (EVM), T… (Tron) or base58 (Solana)"
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Goes well beyond the annotations (readOnly/idempotent/openWorld) by disclosing operational behavior: heavy read that can return busy or timeout under load with a retry-with-backoff recommendation, no auth, and a 1200 requests/min shared rate limit. It also specifies the returned row shape, including finality and conditional usd_amount.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose and scope are front-loaded and every clause carries real information (sibling exclusions, pagination mechanics, output fields, limits). It is dense and long, but not padded; the length is largely justified by the breadth of behavior it must convey without an output schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description supplies the answer shape (items[] with tx_hash, log_index, block_number, block_time, payer, recipient, amount, token, finality, usd_amount) plus pagination, auth, and rate-limit context. An agent has everything needed to call and interpret this tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds genuine semantic value: payer and recipient narrow together (AND), omitting both yields the chain-wide feed, and a page lacking next_cursor is the last. That refines the terse schema text for cursor and the payer/recipient relationship.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource with scope: 'Recent stablecoin transfers on one chain, newest first, filterable by payer and/or recipient, cursor-paginated.' It explicitly names what it is not (get_wallet_graph_walk, get_sync_status, get_address_risk), so an agent can separate it from every relevant sibling without opening a schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit when-to-use ('latest transfers of an address or of the whole chain') and three named alternatives with the condition that selects each ('Not for who an address settles with over time: get_wallet_graph_walk', etc.). Nothing is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources