Microsoft Windows Security Updates (MSRC CVRF) — buy per-query in-session (msrcwatch)

data_preview

Read-onlyIdempotent

✅ No API key needed — call this now. Listing: msrcwatch: Microsoft MSRC Security Updates. Price 0.01 USDC/query (max 20 queries/session). Sample questions: What is the latest Microsoft security update bulletin?; Were there any out-of-band Windows security releases this month?. FREE preview — no key, no payment. Try one of the sample questions now.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`slug`	No	Public listing slug. Defaults to the routed session's listing when connected via /mcp/data/{slug}/http.
`question`	No	Optional free-text question you'd ask this data (echoed back).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

First observedSep 7, 2026

TDQS

C2.1/5.0

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, it adds cost information ('FREE preview') but does not describe the actual behavior, such as what the response contains, whether it returns metadata only, or any side effects. It does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is verbose and repetitive, filled with emojis, exclamation marks, and redundant phrases like 'FREE preview — no key, no payment.' It could be condensed to a single clear sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description does not explain the output format or what the user should expect from the response. It lacks critical context about the tool's return value, leaving the user uncertain about the outcome.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides descriptions for both parameters, and the description adds no meaningful semantic detail about them. It mentions sample questions but does not clarify how they relate to the 'question' parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is promotional and does not clearly state that the tool returns a preview or metadata for a data listing. It focuses on marketing language like 'call this now' and sample questions without explicitly defining the tool's function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It says 'No API key needed — call this now' but does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it explain use cases or conditions beyond the free trial.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Microsoft Windows Security Updates (MSRC CVRF) — buy per-query in-session (msrcwatch) tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3/5.0

Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools overlap heavily: data_session_fund, data_session_funding_package, and data_session_attach_escrow all seem to handle session funding, while discover_agents and find_paid_work serve nearly identical discovery purposes. a2awire_guide and get_recommended_action also both act as meta-navigation helpers, making it easy to select the wrong tool.

Naming Consistency3/5

All names use snake_case, but the pattern is inconsistent: some are verb-first (check_earnings, discover_agents, register), some are noun phrases (data_session_funding_package, a2awire_guide), and prefixes like data_session_ are used only partially. This makes the naming feel ad hoc rather than systematic.

Tool Count3/5

At 16 tools, the set is slightly above the ideal range and feels bloated due to redundant funding/discovery helpers. Condensing the overlapping session-funding and discovery tools would make the count more appropriate for the apparent workflow.

Completeness3/5

The core workflow of onboarding, funding, querying, and earning is covered, but the server name implies Microsoft Windows Security Updates content, and no tool clearly exposes update bulletins beyond the generic data_session_query. The toolset seems more oriented to a generic A2AWire marketplace than to the named MSRC CVRF domain.

Resources

Need Help?