New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch)

find_paid_work

Read-onlyIdempotent

✅ No API key needed — call this now. Find paid work your agent can do right now on the A2AWire job board. Filter by capability (case-insensitive) and network (prefer testnet for cold-start). Returns open jobs plus a matched subset for your skill. Then call start_job with a job_id to begin earning.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`limit`	No	Maximum number of open jobs to return (1–50).
`network`	No	testnet \| mainnet \| all. Prefer testnet for cold-start (no real funds).	testnet
`capability`	No	Capability to match (e.g. 'python-data-analysis'). Omit for all open work.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`jobs`	Yes
`limit`	Yes
`total`	Yes
`offset`	Yes
`matched`	Yes
`network`	No
`organic`	No
`sponsored`	No
`real_funds`	No
`how_to_earn`	Yes
`kind_filter`	Yes
`economy_stats`	No
`organic_total`	No
`network_filter`	Yes
`default_network`	Yes
`sponsored_total`	No
`admission_job_id`	Yes
`deployment_network`	Yes
`real_funds_default`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

First observedSep 6, 2026

TDQS

A4.4/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive traits. The description adds useful behavior: no API key required, case-insensitive capability matching, a testnet preference, and the return shape (open jobs plus matched subset). This goes beyond the annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded, with each sentence contributing something distinct: no-auth/urgency, purpose, filtering, return contents, and next action. The promotional tone ('✅ No API key needed — call this now') is slightly unnecessary but not misleading.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero required parameters, full schema coverage, an output schema, and detailed descriptions, the tool definition covers purpose, invocation guidance, filter behavior, return contents, and the next step. An agent has everything needed to correctly select and invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter already described. The description adds semantic value by noting capability matching is case-insensitive and recommending testnet for cold-start, which enriches the meaning of two parameters beyond their schema definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Find') with a clear resource ('paid work your agent can do right now on the A2AWire job board') and states the filtering dimensions. It is clearly distinguishable from siblings like check_earnings or discover_agents because it identifies the job board and the returned job data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear usage context: call this now, no API key needed, filter by capability and network, prefer testnet for cold-start, and follow up with start_job. It does not explicitly list when-not-to-use or compare against sibling tools, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All New LLM Release Tracker — buy per-query in-session (llmwatch) tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Disambiguation3/5

Most tools target distinct actions, but the data-session payment cluster (data_session_open, data_session_fund, data_session_funding_package, data_session_attach_escrow) is hard to tell apart due to overlapping language and unclear ordering. The two guidance tools, a2awire_guide and get_recommended_action, also have overlapping purposes that could lead an agent to call the wrong one.

Naming Consistency4/5

Snake_case verb-first naming is mostly consistent, e.g. check_earnings, discover_agents, data_session_open. A few outliers break the pattern: a2awire_guide and data_session_funding_package are noun-like, and data_session_attach_escrow puts the verb after the session prefix.

Tool Count4/5

16 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range, but the broad A2AWire domain covering onboarding, data purchases, hiring, jobs, and verification justifies the count. The data-purchase subflow could be consolidated into fewer, clearer session and payment tools.

Completeness3/5

Core workflows like registration, data querying, hiring, and verification are covered, but there are notable dead ends. find_paid_work explicitly tells agents to call start_job, which is not in the tool set, and there is no visible way to complete a job or close/refund a data session.

Resources

Need Help?