Exploit-DB New Exploits & Proof-of-Concepts — buy per-query in-session (exploitdb)

data_session_open

Buy per-query access to live data listings - first taste free via data_preview. Listing: exploitdb: Exploit-DB — New Public Exploits & PoCs (0.01 USDC/query (max 20 queries/session)). Open a prepaid session, then fund and query.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`listing_id`	No	UUID of the listing. Provide exactly one of listing_slug or listing_id.
`max_queries`	No
`listing_slug`	No	Public listing slug (from benchmarks_get / data_directory_get). Provide exactly one of listing_slug or listing_id.
`open_tx_hash`	No
`buyer_address`	No	Buyer EVM address. Optional: defaults to your own platform wallet when omitted.
`proof_escrow_id`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed13 schema fields changedSep 7, 2026

addedInput schema / description

Added value: +"MCP-only input for ``data_session_open``.\n\nSubclasses the REST ``DataSessionOpen`` payload without mutating it (the\n``FaucetUsdcDripInput`` approach) so the shared constraints\n(``max_queries`` bounds, ``open_tx_hash`` length, the EVM address check)\nstay declared once. Two friction-free relaxations, MCP surface only:\n\n* the listing may be named by its public slug OR its UUID (exactly one) -\n  the benchmark route and the purchase-gate 409 hand the agent a slug, and\n  demanding a UUID re-creates the slug-to-UUID lookup hop;\n* ``buyer_address`` is optional - when omitted the handler defaults to the\n  caller's own platform wallet (``WalletService.own_wallet_address``),\n  the same argument-filling default the USDC faucet uses.\n\nThe REST endpoint ``POST /api/v1/data-sessions`` keeps requiring\n``listing_id`` + ``buyer_address`` unchanged.\n\nThe ``type: ignore[assignment]`` marks are the intended pydantic override\n(narrowing the REST fields to Optional here); mypy reads that as an LSP\nviolation even though the model validator enforces exactly one listing\nreference and the handler guards the Optionals."

addedInput schema / properties / buyer_address / anyOf

Added value: +[
+  {
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]

addedInput schema / properties / buyer_address / default
```
Added value: +null
```

addedInput schema / properties / buyer_address / description

Added value: +"Buyer EVM address. Optional: defaults to your own platform wallet when omitted."

removedInput schema / properties / buyer_address / type
```
Removed value: -"string"
```

addedInput schema / properties / listing_id / anyOf

Added value: +[
+  {
+    "format": "uuid",
+    "type": "string"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]

addedInput schema / properties / listing_id / default
```
Added value: +null
```

addedInput schema / properties / listing_id / description

Added value: +"UUID of the listing. Provide exactly one of listing_slug or listing_id."

removedInput schema / properties / listing_id / format
```
Removed value: -"uuid"
```
removedInput schema / properties / listing_id / type
```
Removed value: -"string"
```

addedInput schema / properties / listing_slug

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null,
+  "description": "Public listing slug (from benchmarks_get / data_directory_get). Provide exactly one of listing_slug or listing_id.",
+  "title": "Listing Slug"
+}

removedInput schema / required

Removed value: -[
-  "listing_id",
-  "buyer_address"
-]

changedInput schema / title

Previous value: -"DataSessionOpen"New value: +"DataSessionOpenInput"

First observedSep 6, 2026

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations, the description reveals behavioral details such as defaulting buyer_address to the caller's own wallet, requiring exactly one listing reference, and inheriting shared constraints. It does not describe side effects like on-chain transactions or session creation details, but it adds more transparency than annotations alone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is verbose and heavily implementation-focused, discussing pydantic overrides, type ignores, and REST subclassing. This technical detail obscures the primary user-facing function and makes the description longer than necessary. It would benefit from focusing on the agent-relevant behavior instead.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description provides a high-level workflow hint and explains the key input constraints, but it does not describe the output or return format, error conditions, or how the session is used after opening. Given the tool's moderate complexity, a more complete explanation of the session lifecycle would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides descriptions for only 3 of 6 parameters (50% coverage). The tool description compensates by explaining the listing_slug/listing_id relationship and the buyer_address default. However, open_tx_hash, proof_escrow_id, and max_queries semantics are not elaborated, so the added meaning is partial.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The name and title clearly indicate opening a data session. The description explicitly states 'Buy per-query access to live data listings' and 'Open a prepaid session', so the purpose is clear. However, much of the description focuses on input schema design rather than the core action, preventing a higher score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a hint of the workflow ('then fund and query') but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like data_session_fund or data_preview. No guidance is provided on selecting between sibling tools, so usage guidance is weak.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Exploit-DB New Exploits & Proof-of-Concepts — buy per-query in-session (exploitdb) tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?