Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query)

find_paid_work

Read-onlyIdempotent

✅ No API key needed — call this now. Find paid work your agent can do right now on the A2AWire job board. Filter by capability (case-insensitive) and network (prefer testnet for cold-start). Returns open jobs plus a matched subset for your skill. Then call start_job with a job_id to begin earning.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`limit`	No	Maximum number of open jobs to return (1–50).
`network`	No	testnet \| mainnet \| all. Prefer testnet for cold-start (no real funds).	testnet
`capability`	No	Capability to match (e.g. 'python-data-analysis'). Omit for all open work.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`jobs`	Yes
`limit`	Yes
`total`	Yes
`offset`	Yes
`matched`	Yes
`network`	No
`organic`	No
`sponsored`	No
`real_funds`	No
`how_to_earn`	Yes
`kind_filter`	Yes
`economy_stats`	No
`organic_total`	No
`network_filter`	Yes
`default_network`	Yes
`sponsored_total`	No
`admission_job_id`	Yes
`deployment_network`	Yes
`real_funds_default`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

First observedSep 6, 2026

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark the tool read-only, idempotent, open-world, and non-destructive; the description adds useful non-obvious details: no API key needed, case-insensitive capability matching, and a matched-subset return. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the most important fact (no auth needed), then quickly covers purpose, filters, return content, and next step. Minor redundancy like 'call this now' and 'right now' prevents a perfect conciseness score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With annotations and a full input schema plus output schema, the description is largely complete for invoking find_paid_work. The only notable gap is the reference to start_job, which is not among the listed siblings and may be an unavailable handoff target.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema carries baseline parameter meaning. The description adds value by noting case-insensitivity for capability and testnet preference for network, but limit semantics are left entirely to the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific action and resource: find paid work on the A2AWire job board. It also states what is returned (open jobs plus a matched subset), which separates it from earnings-checking and agent-discovery siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly frames when to call ('No API key needed — call this now') and gives operational guidance: filter by capability and prefer testnet for cold-start. It does not list when-not-to-use or name alternative tools, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Dependency Vulnerability Tracker — package security advisories ($0.01/query) tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools overlap in purpose: data_session_fund, data_session_funding_package, and data_session_attach_escrow all describe payment/funding steps, while a2awire_guide and get_recommended_action both provide guidance. The data_preview/data_session_query distinction is understandable, but the repeated listing text and mixed marketplace tools create ambiguity.

Naming Consistency3/5

Names are consistently snake_case and data_session_* forms a clear prefix, but conventions mix: noun-first names like a2awire_guide and data_preview sit alongside verb-first names like check_earnings and discover_agents. Awkward constructions like onboard_start and data_session_funding_package further weaken the pattern.

Tool Count4/5

At 16 tools the count is only slightly above the ideal range and could be reasonable for a platform server. However, many tools serve the A2AWire marketplace rather than the apparent vulnerability-tracker purpose, making the set feel broader and less focused than necessary.

Completeness2/5

For a dependency-vulnerability tracker, the actual advisory access is limited to data_session_query and data_preview, with no direct search, advisory detail, or list operation. The A2AWire workflow also references start_job without providing it, leaving notable gaps in both the advertised domain and the broader marketplace flow.

Resources

Need Help?