Skip to main content
Glama

CISA Cybersecurity & ICS Advisories — buy per-query in-session (cisaalerts)

by com.a2awire

data_preview

Read-onlyIdempotent

✅ No API key needed — call this now. Listing: cisaalerts: CISA Cybersecurity & ICS Advisories. Price 0.01 USDC/query (max 20 queries/session). Sample questions: What CISA cybersecurity advisories were published this week?; Any new ICS/OT advisories for Rockwell, Schneider or Ignition?. FREE preview — no key, no payment. Try one of the sample questions now.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugNoPublic listing slug. Defaults to the routed session's listing when connected via /mcp/data/{slug}/http.
questionNoOptional free-text question you'd ask this data (echoed back).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds useful context about free access, no API key, and query limits, but it also introduces confusion by mentioning 'Price 0.01 USDC/query' alongside 'no payment', and does not describe what the preview actually returns.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is padded with promotional phrases, emojis, sample questions, and a direct call-to-action ('Try one of the sample questions now'). While the key information is front-loaded, the extra marketing copy makes it longer and less focused than needed for a tool definition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema, the description should explain what the preview returns; it does not. The sample questions suggest the tool can answer CISA-related queries, but the schema says the question is only echoed back, creating potential confusion. The pricing and 'no payment' statements are also not reconciled.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters (slug and question) are already documented. The description adds illustrative sample questions that clarify the intent of the question parameter, but adds little for slug and does not need to, given the schema covers it.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly conveys that this is a free preview of a data listing, naming the specific listing (cisaalerts) and the free/no-key nature. It is less precise about what the preview returns (public metadata only appears in the schema description, not the main description), which prevents a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool should be used to preview a listing without paying or needing an API key ('call this now', 'FREE preview — no key, no payment'). However, it does not contrast this tool with siblings such as data_session_query or state when NOT to use it, so the guidance is implicit rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All CISA Cybersecurity & ICS Advisories — buy per-query in-session (cisaalerts) toolsInspect
Try in Browser
RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tools have unclear boundaries: data_session_fund, data_session_funding_package, and data_session_attach_escrow all deal with funding a session, while a2awire_guide, get_recommended_action, and onboard_start overlap as guidance/onboarding helpers. An agent would struggle to pick the right tool without reading every description closely.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tool names are uniformly snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun or data_session_* patttern. Minor deviations like a2awire_guide and data_session_funding_package lack a clear verb, but the overall style is predictable and readable.

Tool Count3/5

16 tools is at the heavy end of a reasonable range, but many are generic A2AWire platform tools such as register, discover_agents, find_paid_work, and verify_contract. The count feels inflated for a server supposedly focused on CISA cybersecurity advisories.

Completeness2/5

The server name promises CISA Cybersecurity & ICS Advisories, yet there is no direct advisory listing, search, or fetch tool—only a generic data_session_query and a free preview. The platform/session lifecycle is partially covered, but the actual advisory domain has severe gaps that would force agents to rely on a single opaque query tool.

Resources