Skip to main content
Glama

a2a2p — Agent-to-Agent-to-Physical

qualify_specification_exchange_need

Submit one real, unaffiliated low-voltage outdoor sensor enclosure need to A2A2P's ten-submission qualification cohort. Complete outside submissions are stored privately; public evidence remains content-free. This contacts no supplier, collects no payment, places no order, performs no engineering validation, and grants no fabrication authority.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "buyer": "<buyer>",
      "need": "<need>",
      "scope": "<scope>",
      "authority": "<authority>",
      "commercial": "<commercial>",
      "contact": "<contact>",
      "evidence": "<evidence>"
    },
    "name": "qualify_specification_exchange_need"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
needYes
buyerYes
scopeYes
contactYes
evidenceYes
authorityYes
commercialYes
candidate_laneNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / commercial / properties / accepts_5_percent_success_commission
      Removed value: -{
      -  "type": "boolean"
      -}
    • addedInput schema / properties / commercial / properties / accepts_run_charge_terms
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / commercial / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "accepts_5_percent_success_commission"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "accepts_run_charge_terms"
      +]
  2. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • changedInput schema / description
      Previous value: -"Submits one real low-voltage outdoor sensor enclosure need to a private ten-submission qualification cohort. It contacts no supplier, charges nothing, places no order, and grants no authority."New value: +"Submits one real low-voltage outdoor sensor enclosure need in the private ten-submission first-wedge qualification cohort. It contacts no supplier, charges nothing, places no order, and grants no authority."
    • addedInput schema / properties / candidate_lane
      Added value: +{
      +  "enum": [
      +    "low_voltage_outdoor_sensor_enclosure"
      +  ]
      +}
  3. Added

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden and does so well: it explicitly says the tool contacts no supplier, collects no payment, places no order, performs no engineering validation, and grants no fabrication authority. It also discloses privacy handling ('stored privately; public evidence remains content-free'), though it omits authentication or rate-limit details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three tightly written sentences with the core submission action front-loaded. Every sentence adds distinct value: purpose, privacy handling, and explicit non-actions.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The presence of an output schema reduces the need to explain return values, and the description covers high-level purpose and side-effect boundaries. However, for a complex nested input with no schema descriptions, it does not provide enough field-level guidance for an agent to complete the required submission correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the schema has eight nested parameters, so the description must compensate. It only hints at a few constraints ('real, unaffiliated,' 'low-voltage') without explaining the required buyer, need, scope, authority, commercial, contact, or evidence fields, leaving most parameter meaning undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Submit one real, unaffiliated low-voltage outdoor sensor enclosure need' to a 'ten-submission qualification cohort.' This distinguishes the action from generic specification review or supplier-request tools, though it does not explicitly name a sibling alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Eligibility constraints are implied by 'one real, unaffiliated low-voltage outdoor sensor enclosure need' and 'qualification cohort,' giving the agent context for when submission is appropriate. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this instead of siblings like review_specification or request_physical_solution, nor does it provide exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources