Skip to main content
Glama

SocialDataX 快手 Kuaishou MCP

kuaishou_search_users

Read-only

搜索快手用户。用户需要按搜索词查找用户时使用;keyword 只传搜索词,不要传作品链接,也不要传用户主页链接、photo_id 或 user_id;已有用户主页链接或 user_id 时使用对应用户资料或用户作品列表工具;支持 page_token 翻页。

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
keywordYes搜索快手用户的搜索词,可传关键词或短语,例如人物名、账号名、品牌名或机构名;不要传作品链接,也不要传用户主页链接、photo_id、user_id 或 page_token。已有用户主页链接或非空 user_id 时改用需要快手用户主页 URL/user_id 的入口。
page_tokenNo用户搜索分页令牌。首次请求留空。继续翻页时必须将上一页返回的完整 next_page_token 原样作为 page_token 传回;page_token 是不透明分页令牌;不得修改、截断、缩写、脱敏、掩码、省略、规范化、重组或自行生成,不得用省略号替换中间内容。只能用于同一用户搜索分页链路和同一关键词,不能跨能力、关键词或搜索链路复用。

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes当前页用户结果列表。
pointsYes本次成功调用的积分消耗与调用完成时的账户积分余额。
next_page_tokenYes下一页不透明分页令牌;为空表示没有更多结果。继续翻页时必须将返回的完整 next_page_token 原样作为 page_token 传回。next_page_token 只能用于同一能力和同一分页链路,不能跨能力、作品、用户、评论或搜索链路复用;不得修改、截断、缩写、脱敏、掩码、省略、规范化、重组或自行生成,不得用省略号替换中间内容。

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

注解已包含readOnlyHint=true,描述未与此矛盾并补充了分页支持,但未提供更多行为细节(如返回结构、结果排序等)。由于注解已覆盖安全性,描述增加的内容有限,评分中规中矩。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述紧凑,两个句子传递了核心用途、排除条件和使用场景,信息密度高且无冗余。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

工具仅有2个参数且描述清晰,输出schema存在无需额外说明返回格式。描述覆盖了主要使用场景和翻页机制,但未提及返回字段或排序,在存在输出schema的情况下完整度足够。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

输入schema覆盖100%,参数keyword和page_token均有详细描述。描述本身重复了schema中的约束(keyword不要传链接等),未提供超出schema的额外语义,因此评分基于schema覆盖率的基准3。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

使用明确的动词"搜索"和资源"快手用户",并清晰说明了用途:按搜索词查找用户。同时明确区分了与已有用户主页链接或user_id时使用其他工具的差异,与兄弟工具区分明确。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述明确指出何时使用(按搜索词查找用户)和何时不使用(已有用户主页链接或user_id时改用对应用户资料或用户作品列表工具),并列出了keyword的禁止输入类型,提供了明确的替代路径。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clear, distinct purpose. Pairs that differ by input method (profile URL vs user_id, photo_id vs URL) are clearly separated by input type, and no two tools appear to do the same thing. Search, user info, video details, comments, speech-to-text, and points balance are all unambiguous.

Naming Consistency4/5

The vast majority of tools follow a consistent `kuaishou_<verb>_<resource>[_by_<identifier>]` pattern (e.g., `kuaishou_get_user_info_by_user_id`). The only outlier is `socialdatax_get_points_balance`, which breaks the prefix convention but is still readable. Minor inconsistency lowers the score slightly.

Tool Count5/5

16 tools is well-scoped for a social media data access server. Each tool covers a distinct functional need—user info, videos, comments, speech-to-text, search, and account balance—without being excessive or sparse for the domain.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface covers the typical read-side workflows for Kuaishou: hot list, user profiles, user videos, video details, comments and replies, speech-to-text, and search. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no followers/following lists, no pagination on hot search), but these are not critical for the core purpose of retrieving public data.

Resources