Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters (photo_id and page_token) are already documented in detail in the schema. The tool description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the schema. Since the schema handles the parameter semantics adequately, the baseline of 3 applies. The description itself does not mention parameters, but the schema does the heavy lifting, so no penalty.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.